Thanks for running the release, Tom.

I performed the following validations:
* Verified all checksums and signatures.
* Built from source and ran unit tests.
* Ran the first quickstart steps for both ZK and KRaft.
* Spotchecked the Javadocs.

I noticed the same issues as others on the website. I checked
the doc in git and it looks good.

+1 (binding)

Best,
David

On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 7:52 PM Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> RC1 was tested with Apache Spark tests
>
> - https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/36135
>
> Thanks,
> Dongjoon.
>
> On 2022/05/05 03:25:25 Luke Chen wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > I did:
> > 1. check the signature and checksums
> > 2. ran quick start with java17 + sacla2.12
> > 3. browse java docs/documentations
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks for running the release.
> >
> > Luke
> >
> > On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 12:43 AM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > Thanks for running the release!
> > >
> > > I did the following checks:
> > >
> > >    1. Validated all the checksum and signatures
> > >    2. Built from source and ran the unit tests (Java 11)
> > >    3. Ran the quickstart and the Kafka Streams demo (Java 11)
> > >    4. Did a quick scan of the Javadoc and the documentation
> > >
> > > I noticed the same issues as Mickael on the website, but otherwise, it
> > > looks good.
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bill
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 10:17 AM Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding). I used the Scala 2.13 binaries and staged Maven
> > > artifacts
> > > > and ran various tests with them. Thanks for doing the release.
> > > >
> > > > Jakub
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 8:16 PM Mickael Maison <mimai...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Tom,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for running this release!
> > > > >
> > > > > I've done the following:
> > > > > - Checked signatures and checksums
> > > > > - Checked javadocs/maven artifacts
> > > > > - Built from source and run all tests with Java 11
> > > > > - Ran quickstart on Scala 2.13 artifact with Java 11
> > > > >
> > > > > It looks like the website has not been updated yet, I still only see
> > > > > 3.1.0. When you'll add 3.1.1, let's make sure we mention reload4j in
> > > > > the notable changes section.
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Mickael
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:12 AM Tom Bentley <tbent...@redhat.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is the first candidate for release of Apache Kafka 3.1.1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apache Kafka 3.1.1 is a bugfix release and 30 issues have been fixed
> > > > > > since 3.1.0.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Release notes for the 3.1.1 release:
> > > > > >
> > > https://home.apache.org/~tombentley/kafka-3.1.1-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *** Please download, test and vote by 09:00 UTC, Friday 6th May
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > > > > > https://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary):
> > > > > > https://home.apache.org/~tombentley/kafka-3.1.1-rc1/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Maven artifacts to be voted upon:
> > > > > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/kafka/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Javadoc:
> > > > > > https://home.apache.org/~tombentley/kafka-3.1.1-rc1/javadoc/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Tag to be voted upon (off 3.1 branch) is the 3.1.1 tag:
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/releases/tag/3.1.1-rc1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Documentation:
> > > > > > https://kafka.apache.org/31/documentation.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Protocol:
> > > > > > https://kafka.apache.org/31/protocol.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Successful Jenkins builds for the 3.1 branch:
> > > > > > I will share a link one the build is complete.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /**************************************
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Tom
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >

Reply via email to