Thank you for sharing your assessment, Tom and Chris.

Apache Spark community had a discussion thread on March.

https://lists.apache.org/thread/yq6f5gv7gtdbk1ynwpd9hnc547bgz03m
"[DISCUSS] Migration guide on upgrading Kafka to 3.1 in Spark 3.3"

As a person who initiated that upgrade via SPARK-36837, I need to answer it 
before Apache Spark 3.3 RC2. In the worst case, Apache Spark community may 
decide to wait for next Kafka versions instead of upgrading.

Thank you again all people to help this release!

Bests,
Dongjoon.

On 2022/05/12 01:39:16 Chris Egerton wrote:
> It's worth noting that one of the most frequent offenders
> (RebalanceSourceConnectorsIntegrationTest.testDeleteConnector), which
> failed in five of the nine runs from 111 through 119, is actually disabled
> on 3.2 and trunk as it's caused by a known and not-yet-addressed bug in
> rebalancing logic. Since it's not a regression we can safely ignore those
> failures, but if we plan on putting out another 3.1 release we should
> probably disable that test on 3.1 as well.
> 
> On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 3:32 AM Tom Bentley <tbent...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Dongjoon,
> >
> > I've been trying to get a green build of the 3.1 branch from Jenkins (
> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Kafka/job/kafka/job/3.1/) since my
> > original email promised to provide this. Individually each stage between
> > builds 111 and 119 has passed in at least one run, but there have been no
> > runs where all stages have passed.
> >
> > However, as you note, the vote has the necessary 3 binding votes, so
> > assuming the voters don't wish to change their votes I can proceed with the
> > release. If this is not the case please respond on the thread. If I hear
> > nothing in the next 24 hours I will assume the voters are OK with this and
> > proceed with the rest of the release process.
> >
> > Apologies for the delay,
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 08:15, Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Tom.
> > >
> > > Could you conclude this vote as a release manager? :)
> > >
> > > Dongjoon.
> > >
> > > On 2022/05/06 13:31:15 Michal Tóth wrote:
> > > > Hello
> > > >
> > > > I have executed some produce/consume system tests which all passed.
> > > > Also everything passed from
> > > https://github.com/tombentley/kafka-verify-rc
> > > > - checking signatures, checksums, with gradle unit & integration tests,
> > > etc.
> > > >
> > > > Good from me (non-binding).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > pi 6. 5. 2022 o 14:30 David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io.invalid>
> > > napísal(a):
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for running the release, Tom.
> > > > >
> > > > > I performed the following validations:
> > > > > * Verified all checksums and signatures.
> > > > > * Built from source and ran unit tests.
> > > > > * Ran the first quickstart steps for both ZK and KRaft.
> > > > > * Spotchecked the Javadocs.
> > > > >
> > > > > I noticed the same issues as others on the website. I checked
> > > > > the doc in git and it looks good.
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > David
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 7:52 PM Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > RC1 was tested with Apache Spark tests
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/36135
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Dongjoon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 2022/05/05 03:25:25 Luke Chen wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi Tom,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I did:
> > > > > > > 1. check the signature and checksums
> > > > > > > 2. ran quick start with java17 + sacla2.12
> > > > > > > 3. browse java docs/documentations
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for running the release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Luke
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 12:43 AM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Tom,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks for running the release!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I did the following checks:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >    1. Validated all the checksum and signatures
> > > > > > > >    2. Built from source and ran the unit tests (Java 11)
> > > > > > > >    3. Ran the quickstart and the Kafka Streams demo (Java 11)
> > > > > > > >    4. Did a quick scan of the Javadoc and the documentation
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I noticed the same issues as Mickael on the website, but
> > > otherwise,
> > > > > it
> > > > > > > > looks good.
> > > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Bill
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 10:17 AM Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding). I used the Scala 2.13 binaries and staged
> > > Maven
> > > > > > > > artifacts
> > > > > > > > > and ran various tests with them. Thanks for doing the
> > release.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Jakub
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 8:16 PM Mickael Maison <
> > > > > mimai...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Tom,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for running this release!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I've done the following:
> > > > > > > > > > - Checked signatures and checksums
> > > > > > > > > > - Checked javadocs/maven artifacts
> > > > > > > > > > - Built from source and run all tests with Java 11
> > > > > > > > > > - Ran quickstart on Scala 2.13 artifact with Java 11
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It looks like the website has not been updated yet, I still
> > > only
> > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > 3.1.0. When you'll add 3.1.1, let's make sure we mention
> > > > > reload4j in
> > > > > > > > > > the notable changes section.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > Mickael
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:12 AM Tom Bentley <
> > > > > tbent...@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > This is the first candidate for release of Apache Kafka
> > > 3.1.1.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Apache Kafka 3.1.1 is a bugfix release and 30 issues have
> > > been
> > > > > fixed
> > > > > > > > > > > since 3.1.0.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Release notes for the 3.1.1 release:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > https://home.apache.org/~tombentley/kafka-3.1.1-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > *** Please download, test and vote by 09:00 UTC, Friday
> > > 6th May
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > > > > release:
> > > > > > > > > > > https://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > * Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary):
> > > > > > > > > > > https://home.apache.org/~tombentley/kafka-3.1.1-rc1/
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > * Maven artifacts to be voted upon:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/kafka/
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > * Javadoc:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > https://home.apache.org/~tombentley/kafka-3.1.1-rc1/javadoc/
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > * Tag to be voted upon (off 3.1 branch) is the 3.1.1 tag:
> > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/releases/tag/3.1.1-rc1
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > * Documentation:
> > > > > > > > > > > https://kafka.apache.org/31/documentation.html
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > * Protocol:
> > > > > > > > > > > https://kafka.apache.org/31/protocol.html
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > * Successful Jenkins builds for the 3.1 branch:
> > > > > > > > > > > I will share a link one the build is complete.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > /**************************************
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > Tom
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > S pozdravom
> > > >      Michal Tóth
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 

Reply via email to