Hey Mehari, Thanks for adding that section. I think one other thing folks have considered is including two timestamps in the message format -- one for the client side timestamp and one for the server side. Of course, this would require a bump to the message format, and that hasn't happened in a while. Could we include some information on this approach and why we aren't pursuing it? I think message format bumps are tricky, but it is worth calling out that this is also an option.
Thanks, Justine On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 4:51 PM Beyene, Mehari <meh...@amazon.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi Justine, > > I added a section under Proposed Changes -> Timestamp Validation Logic to > capture how the INVALID_TIMESTAMP is handled in this KIP. > Please let me know if there are any additional areas you would like me to > address. > > Thanks, > Mehari > > > > >
