Thanks Ziming! +1 (binding)

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024, 03:23 ziming deng <dengziming1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you for reminding this, David,
>
> I have mentioned this in the [Compatibility] section as a following work.
>
> --,
> Best,
> Ziming
>
> > On Jan 23, 2024, at 15:17, David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Chris, Ziming,
> >
> > Thanks for the clarification. I am glad that it does not impact the tool.
> > It may be worth adding a note about it in the KIP to avoid the same
> > question in the future.
> >
> > Otherwise, I am +1 (binding). Thanks for driving this!
> >
> > Best,
> > David
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 6:07 AM ziming deng <dengziming1...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hello David,
> >>
> >> Thanks for reminding this, as Chirs explained, the tools I’m trying to
> >> update only support set/delete configs, and I’m just make a way for
> >> append/subtract configs in the future, so this would not be affected by
> >> KAFKA-10140, and it would be a little overkill to support
> append/subtract
> >> configs or solve KAFKA-10140 here, so let’s leave it right now, I'm
> happy
> >> to pick it after finishing this KIP.
> >>
> >> --,
> >> Ziming
> >>
> >>> On Jan 22, 2024, at 18:23, David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io.INVALID>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Ziming,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for driving this. I wanted to bring KAFKA-10140
> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10140> to your attention.
> >> It
> >>> looks like the incremental API does not work for configuring plugins. I
> >>> think that we need to cover this in the KIP.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> David
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 10:13 AM Andrew Schofield <
> >>> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Andrew
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 22 Jan 2024, at 07:29, Federico Valeri <fedeval...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +1 (non binding)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 7:03 AM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Ziming,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1(binding) from me.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>> Luke
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 11:50 AM Kamal Chandraprakash <
> >>>>>> kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 8:34 AM ziming deng <
> >> dengziming1...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hello everyone,
> >>>>>>>> I'd like to initiate a vote for KIP-1011.
> >>>>>>>> This KIP is about replacing alterConfigs with
> >> incrementalAlterConfigs
> >>>>>>>> when updating broker configs using kafka-configs.sh, this is
> similar
> >>>> to
> >>>>>>>> what we have done in KIP-894.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> KIP link:
> >>>>>>>> KIP-1011: Use incrementalAlterConfigs when updating broker configs
> >> by
> >>>>>>>> kafka-configs.sh - Apache Kafka - Apache Software Foundation
> >>>>>>>> <
> >>>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1011%3A+Use+incrementalAlterConfigs+when+updating+broker+configs+by+kafka-configs.sh
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> cwiki.apache.org
> >>>>>>>> <
> >>>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1011%3A+Use+incrementalAlterConfigs+when+updating+broker+configs+by+kafka-configs.sh
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [image: favicon.ico]
> >>>>>>>> <
> >>>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1011%3A+Use+incrementalAlterConfigs+when+updating+broker+configs+by+kafka-configs.sh
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> <
> >>>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1011%3A+Use+incrementalAlterConfigs+when+updating+broker+configs+by+kafka-configs.sh
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Discussion thread:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> lists.apache.org
> >>>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/xd28mgqy75stgsvp6qybzpljzflkqcsy
> >
> >>>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/xd28mgqy75stgsvp6qybzpljzflkqcsy
> >
> >>>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/xd28mgqy75stgsvp6qybzpljzflkqcsy
> >
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --,
> >>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>> Ziming
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to