Hi  Chia-Ping:

Thanks for your comments.

Hi  all voters:

Let me update one message:
I updated the KIP part content and related code according to Chia-Ping's
suggestions. Let me paste the change here:

having TopicBasedRemoteLogMetadataManager (instead of
 RemoteLogMetadataManager) implement BrokerReadyCallback. It can also solve
Kamal Chandraprakash‘s concern.

public interface RemoteLogMetadataManager extends  BrokerReadyCallback ,
Configurable, Closeable
=>
public class TopicBasedRemoteLogMetadataManager implements
BrokerReadyCallback, RemoteLogMetadataManager

Regards
Jian

Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]> 于2025年10月23日周四 09:14写道:

> hi all voters,
>
> I have an alternative idea [0] for addressing the issue without exposing a
> new interface as a public Kafka API.
>
> While I'm fine with the new Kafka API since it has received three binding
> votes, my preference remains to fix the issue with the most minimal changes
> possible
>
> [0] https://lists.apache.org/thread/0gkrb44rb6tj4ocn4qhy63rt64tsw9tl
>
> Best,
> Chia-Ping
>
> On 2025/10/21 13:52:24 Andrew Schofield wrote:
> > Hi,
> > When I first reviewed this KIP, I was a bit unconvinced about the need
> but
> > the generic broker ready interface looks good to me.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andrew
> >
> >
> > > On 21 Oct 2025, at 14:39, jian fu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Luke:
> > >
> > > Thanks for your review !
> > >
> > > Hi  Kafka committers:
> > >
> > > As of now, we’re just one binding vote short to move forward. We’ve
> been in
> > > the voting phase for three months.— if anyone has a moment, could you
> > > please help take a look at this KIP? Thanks a lot!
> > > Anatolii Popov                  +1 (non-binding)
> > > Jhen-Yung Hsu                +1 (non-binding)
> > > Kamal Chandraprakash   +1 (binding)
> > > Luke                                 +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Luke Chen <[email protected]> 于2025年10月20日周一 19:22写道:
> > >
> > >> +1 (binding) from me.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks.
> > >> Luke
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 5:24 PM jian fu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Kafka committers:
> > >>>
> > >>> Bumping the thread once more. Help to take a look and vote. We still
> > >> need 2
> > >>> binding votes ! BTW:  This KIP isn’t a complex one.
> > >>>
> > >>> jian fu <[email protected]> 于2025年10月6日周一 22:12写道:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi Kafka commiters:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I’ve summarized the current voting status as follows. We still need
> two
> > >>>> binding votes to move forward. Could anyone take a look at the KIP?
> > >>> Thanks.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Anatolii Popov            KIP! +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>> Kamal Chandraprakash     KIP! +1 (binding)
> > >>>> Jhen-Yung Hsu                  KIP! +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The KIP link is:
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1197%3A+Introduce+new+method+to+improve+the+TopicBasedRemoteLogMetadataManager%27s+initialization
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Anatolii Popov <[email protected]> 于2025年10月3日周五
> > >> 20:10写道:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hi Jian,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks for the KIP! +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>> Anatolii.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2025 at 2:34 AM jian fu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Still need 2 votes (binding)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> BTW.   I don't know why this vote (no binding) is not shown in
> this
> > >>>>>> message thread . So paste the mail content here for tracking.
> > >>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/w0zn73qqhgo41hzxshq8r1okzhsh0cbw
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> [image: image.png]
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> jian fu <[email protected]> 于2025年8月21日周四 15:47写道:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hi All,
> > >>>>>>> Could anyone else kindly take a look at this KIP?
> > >>>>>>> It’s not a complex one — we just need to add a default interface
> > >>> method
> > >>>>>>> in order to move the PR forward.
> > >>>>>>> Many thanks!
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> Regards
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Fu.Jian
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Regards
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Fu.Jian
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Regards
> > >>>
> > >>> Fu.Jian
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to