Hi all, Thanks for voting on this KIP. The KIP is approved. Kamal Chandraprakash +1 (binding) Andrew Schofield +1 (binding) Luke +1 (binding) Anatolii Popov +1 (non-binding) Jhen-Yung Hsu +1 (non-binding) Thanks, Jian
jian fu <[email protected]> 于2025年10月23日周四 16:05写道： > Hi Chia-Ping： > > Thanks for your comments. > > Hi all voters: > > Let me update one message: > I updated the KIP part content and related code according to Chia-Ping's > suggestions. Let me paste the change here: > > having TopicBasedRemoteLogMetadataManager (instead of > RemoteLogMetadataManager) implement BrokerReadyCallback. It can also solve > Kamal Chandraprakash‘s concern. > > public interface RemoteLogMetadataManager extends BrokerReadyCallback , > Configurable, Closeable > => > public class TopicBasedRemoteLogMetadataManager implements > BrokerReadyCallback, RemoteLogMetadataManager > > Regards > Jian > > Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]> 于2025年10月23日周四 09:14写道： > >> hi all voters, >> >> I have an alternative idea [0] for addressing the issue without exposing >> a new interface as a public Kafka API. >> >> While I'm fine with the new Kafka API since it has received three binding >> votes, my preference remains to fix the issue with the most minimal changes >> possible >> >> [0] https://lists.apache.org/thread/0gkrb44rb6tj4ocn4qhy63rt64tsw9tl >> >> Best, >> Chia-Ping >> >> On 2025/10/21 13:52:24 Andrew Schofield wrote: >> > Hi, >> > When I first reviewed this KIP, I was a bit unconvinced about the need >> but >> > the generic broker ready interface looks good to me. >> > >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Andrew >> > >> > >> > > On 21 Oct 2025, at 14:39, jian fu <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > Hi Luke: >> > > >> > > Thanks for your review ！ >> > > >> > > Hi Kafka committers: >> > > >> > > As of now, we’re just one binding vote short to move forward. We’ve >> been in >> > > the voting phase for three months.— if anyone has a moment, could you >> > > please help take a look at this KIP? Thanks a lot! >> > > Anatolii Popov +1 (non-binding) >> > > Jhen-Yung Hsu +1 (non-binding) >> > > Kamal Chandraprakash +1 (binding) >> > > Luke +1 (binding) >> > > >> > > Luke Chen <[email protected]> 于2025年10月20日周一 19:22写道： >> > > >> > >> +1 (binding) from me. >> > >> >> > >> Thanks. >> > >> Luke >> > >> >> > >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 5:24 PM jian fu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> Hi Kafka committers: >> > >>> >> > >>> Bumping the thread once more. Help to take a look and vote. We still >> > >> need 2 >> > >>> binding votes ！ BTW: This KIP isn’t a complex one. >> > >>> >> > >>> jian fu <[email protected]> 于2025年10月6日周一 22:12写道： >> > >>> >> > >>>> Hi Kafka commiters: >> > >>>> >> > >>>> I’ve summarized the current voting status as follows. We still >> need two >> > >>>> binding votes to move forward. Could anyone take a look at the KIP? >> > >>> Thanks. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Anatolii Popov KIP! +1 (non-binding) >> > >>>> Kamal Chandraprakash KIP! +1 (binding) >> > >>>> Jhen-Yung Hsu KIP! +1 (non-binding) >> > >>>> >> > >>>> The KIP link is: >> > >>>> >> > >>> >> > >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1197%3A+Introduce+new+method+to+improve+the+TopicBasedRemoteLogMetadataManager%27s+initialization >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Anatolii Popov <[email protected]> 于2025年10月3日周五 >> > >> 20:10写道： >> > >>>> >> > >>>>> Hi Jian, >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Thanks for the KIP! +1 (non-binding) >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Regards, >> > >>>>> Anatolii. >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2025 at 2:34 AM jian fu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>>> Still need 2 votes (binding) >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> BTW. I don't know why this vote (no binding) is not shown in >> this >> > >>>>>> message thread . So paste the mail content here for tracking. >> > >>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/w0zn73qqhgo41hzxshq8r1okzhsh0cbw >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> [image: image.png] >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> jian fu <[email protected]> 于2025年8月21日周四 15:47写道： >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Hi All, >> > >>>>>>> Could anyone else kindly take a look at this KIP? >> > >>>>>>> It’s not a complex one — we just need to add a default interface >> > >>> method >> > >>>>>>> in order to move the PR forward. >> > >>>>>>> Many thanks! >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> -- >> > >>>>>> Regards >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Fu.Jian >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> -- >> > >>>> Regards >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Fu.Jian >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>> >> > >>> -- >> > >>> Regards >> > >>> >> > >>> Fu.Jian >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > > > >
