Hi, Christo,

KAFKA-20003 doesn't cause a real problem for 4.2.0. So, I closed it.

Thanks,

Jun

On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 4:03 AM Christo Lolov <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello!
>
> Thanks Matthias and Chia-Ping for letting me know!
>
> I have done one more audit on the remaining 9 JIRAs with a 4.2.0 tag
> in the release plan.
>
> The current blockers are KAFKA-19012, KAFKA-17862 and KAFKA-19999.
>
> What is the consensus on KAFKA-20003 - should I be treating it as a
> blocker?
>
> Matthias's bugfix is KAFKA-20002.
>
> I have requested a bit more information about the state of
> KAFKA-19851, KAFKA-19964, KAFKA-15370 and KAFKA-19891. They aren't
> currently marked as blockers, but there has been recent activity on
> all of them and I would like to understand whether we are aiming to
> include them in 4.2 or whether we are bumping them to 4.3.
>
> Let me know if I have missed something else!
>
> Best,
> Christo
>
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 at 16:18, Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > hi
> >
> > there is another crucial issue regarding TV2 (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-19999)
> >
> > I hope we can ship it in 4.2.0 as well
> >
> > Best,
> > Chia-Ping
> >
> > Matthias J. Sax <[email protected]> 於 2025年12月17日週三 下午11:57寫道:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > by chance, we found a critical bug in Kafka Streams yesterday:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-20002 -- PR is already up.
> > > It's a trivial fix.
> > >
> > > It's not a regression, as the issue was introduced with 4.0 release,
> and
> > > it's also not a blocker, and we are after code freeze.
> > >
> > > So want to highlight it. I would like to get it into 4.2.0 release if
> > > there are no objections.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > > On 11/28/25 7:14 AM, Christo Lolov wrote:
> > > > Heya!
> > > >
> > > > Added it, thanks for pointing it out. I have done one more audit and
> > > reached out to implementers for a couple of KIPs which should probably
> be
> > > moved to a subsequent release!
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Christo
> > > >
> > > >> On 26 Nov 2025, at 06:30, Herman K. Jakobsen <
> [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Looks like my previous mail unfortunately wasn't sent. However,
> could
> > > we
> > > >> include KIP-1146 - Anchored Punctuation? The feature is already
> > > implemented
> > > >> and merged to trunk.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >>
> > > >> Herman
> > > >>
> > > >>> On 2025/10/30 07:27:22 Christo Lolov wrote:
> > > >>> Hello!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> We have now passed the KIP freeze date for 4.2.0. The next goal is
> the
> > > >>> feature freeze on the 19th of November!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Feel free to reachout on this thread if your changes are not
> getting
> > > >>> traction to meet that date!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Best,
> > > >>> Christo
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 at 11:16, Christo Lolov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Hello!
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> This is to bump the 4.2.0 thread to the top of the mailing list!
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The KIP freeze date is 1 week from today on the 29th of October.
> > > >>>> Please ensure that you have the required number of binding votes
> for
> > > >>>> your KIP by that date if you would like it included in 4.2.0.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Best,
> > > >>>> Christo
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 at 15:08, Mickael Maison <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Hi,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I think moving code freeze to December 10 makes sense.
> > > >>>>> Many people will be off the last 2 weeks of December, so it's
> best to
> > > >>>>> not have deadlines then.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>> Mickael
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 3:49 PM Christo Lolov <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Hello!
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Thanks for the review!
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I am okay with pulling all dates by 2 weeks earlier in time
> > > >> (barring the
> > > >>>>>> 7th of January one). If there are no objections to the new
> dates I
> > > >> will
> > > >>>>>> update them in the plan tomorrow!
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>> Christo
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 at 07:14, Ismael Juma <[email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Hi Christo,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Thanks for managing the release and for the proposed release
> > > >> plan.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Given our desire to ship every 4 months, I think the proposed
> > > >> dates should
> > > >>>>>>> be shifted a bit. The original plan was for 4.1 to ship in mid
> > > >> July and for
> > > >>>>>>> 4.2 to ship in mid November. The former eventually shipped on
> > > >> September 2nd
> > > >>>>>>> and with the current plan would probably result in 4.2 shipping
> > > >> in late
> > > >>>>>>> January/early February. Given where we are, I would suggest
> > > >> something like:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> KIP Freeze: October 29 (Wednesday)
> > > >>>>>>> Feature Freeze: November 19 (Wednesday)
> > > >>>>>>> Code Freeze: December 10 (Wednesday)
> > > >>>>>>> At least four weeks of stabilization will follow Code Freeze
> > > >> (taking
> > > >>>>>>> holidays into account), meaning we expect to release no earlier
> > > >> than
> > > >>>>>>> January 7 2026.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Ideally, we'd get RC0 out before the holiday break and then
> > > >> complete the
> > > >>>>>>> release by early/mid January.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Thoughts?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Ismael
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 6:09 AM Christo Lolov <[email protected]
> >
> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Hello!
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> I would like to volunteer to be the release manager for the
> > > >> Apache Kafka
> > > >>>>>>>> 4.2.0 release.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> If no one has any objections, you can find a proposed release
> > > >> plan at
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+4.2.0.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>>>> Christo
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to