Thank you both. Mickael, thank you for the last minute catch. I’ve moved the abstract methods to rejected alternatives and added default methods to both Header/Headers.
This also simplifies the KIP and removes the changes affecting RecordHeader(s). Please take a look at the updated version. Best, Aditya > On Oct 22, 2026, at 08:31, Andrew Schofield <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Andrew > >> On 2026/10/22 15:25:41 Mickael Maison wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for the KIP >> +1 (binding) >> >> Thanks, >> Mickael >> >>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 8:49 PM Aditya Kousik <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> Gentle ping on this KIP. With the proposal, we can swap >>> record.headers().add(“isRetryRecord”, new byte[] { 0x0 }); with >>> record.headers.add(“isRetryRecord”, false); similarly for other plain >>> datatypes. >>> >>> Best, >>> Aditya >>> >>>> On May 26, 2026, at 22:23, Aditya Kousik <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I'd like to start the vote for KIP-1308. >>>> >>>> KIP Design doc: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/FpY8G >>>> Discussion thread: >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/odpnx9ttbws0fjhfh07vspb5mklv2zq4 >>>> >>>> Thanks and regards, >>>> Aditya Kousik >>
