Thanks for the update. I think there's an orphaned "ofStringUtf8" floating around in there.
Thanks, Andrew On 2026/10/23 15:17:53 Aditya Kousik via dev wrote: > Thank you both. > > Mickael, thank you for the last minute catch. I’ve moved the abstract methods > to rejected alternatives and added default methods to both Header/Headers. > > This also simplifies the KIP and removes the changes affecting > RecordHeader(s). > > Please take a look at the updated version. > > Best, > Aditya > > > On Oct 22, 2026, at 08:31, Andrew Schofield <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Andrew > > > >> On 2026/10/22 15:25:41 Mickael Maison wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Thanks for the KIP > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Mickael > >> > >>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 8:49 PM Aditya Kousik <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Greetings, > >>> > >>> Gentle ping on this KIP. With the proposal, we can swap > >>> record.headers().add(“isRetryRecord”, new byte[] { 0x0 }); with > >>> record.headers.add(“isRetryRecord”, false); similarly for other plain > >>> datatypes. > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Aditya > >>> > >>>> On May 26, 2026, at 22:23, Aditya Kousik <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> I'd like to start the vote for KIP-1308. > >>>> > >>>> KIP Design doc: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/FpY8G > >>>> Discussion thread: > >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/odpnx9ttbws0fjhfh07vspb5mklv2zq4 > >>>> > >>>> Thanks and regards, > >>>> Aditya Kousik > >> >
