-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26373/#review56434
-----------------------------------------------------------



core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ReplicaManager.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26373/#comment96736>

    if (!partition.makeFollower(...))
    
    However, see the comment further down on this.



core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ReplicaManager.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26373/#comment96747>

    Also, if the above change is to be made maybe we should remove this info 
message. However, as mentioned further below we should probably skip this 
partition altogether.



core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ReplicaManager.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26373/#comment96742>

    Can tweak this a bit? How about:
    
    Broker %d received LeaderAndIsrRequest with correlation id %d from 
controller %d epoch %d for partition [%s,%d] but cannot become follower since 
the new leader %d is unavailable.



core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ReplicaManager.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26373/#comment96745>

    If a replica is already following a leader, it is unnecessary to stop the 
fetcher, truncate to HW and restart the fetcher. So I think we should still 
skip such partitions.  (The associated replica will already be in the 
checkpoint array so its checkpoint won't get lost)


- Joel Koshy


On Oct. 6, 2014, 5:06 p.m., Jiangjie Qin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/26373/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 6, 2014, 5:06 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1647
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1647
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fix for Kafka-1647.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ReplicaManager.scala 
> 78b7514cc109547c562e635824684fad581af653 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26373/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jiangjie Qin
> 
>

Reply via email to