-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36590/#review92222
-----------------------------------------------------------



clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/KafkaConsumer.java 
(line 1069)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36590/#comment146249>

    That is a good point and is actually true. The reason the test I added 
worked fine is because it never added any topic to metadata, so it sent a 
TopicMetadataRequest with no topics, in which case metadata for all topics is 
sent back by broker. However, if I add some topics to metadata by calling {{var 
mapTopicParts = this.consumers(0).partitionsFor(topic1, topic2)}} before 
calling {{var mapTopicParts = this.consumers(0).partitionsFor()}} the test 
fails. Will add the test and address the issues. Thanks!


- Ashish Singh


On July 18, 2015, 4:39 a.m., Ashish Singh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/36590/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 18, 2015, 4:39 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-2275
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2275
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Return metadata for all topics if empty list is passed to partitionsFor
> 
> 
> KAFKA-2275: Add a "Map<String, List<PartitionInfo>> partitionsFor(String... 
> topics)" API to the new consumer
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/Consumer.java 
> 252b759c0801f392e3526b0f31503b4b8fbf1c8a 
>   clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/KafkaConsumer.java 
> bea3d737c51be77d5b5293cdd944d33b905422ba 
>   clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/MockConsumer.java 
> c14eed1e95f2e682a235159a366046f00d1d90d6 
>   core/src/test/scala/integration/kafka/api/ConsumerTest.scala 
> 3eb5f95731a3f06f662b334ab2b3d0ad7fa9e1ca 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36590/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ashish Singh
> 
>

Reply via email to