Thanks to all who voted. Looks like this KIP passes with +5 (binding), and +1 (non-binding).
-Jason On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:44 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Ismael > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > Minor note: I've changed the restart API to be blocking as discussed in > the > > other thread. > > > > -Jason > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Neha Narkhede <n...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Jay Kreps <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Jason Gustafson < > ja...@confluent.io> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to open the vote on KIP-52, which adds several control > > APIs > > > to > > > > > > Kafka Connect: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-52%3A+Connector+Control+APIs > > > > > > . > > > > > > Compared to some of the other active KIPs, this is a relatively > > small > > > > > > feature, but it makes administration of Connect clusters much > > easier. > > > > If > > > > > > adopted, I'm hoping to get this into 0.10. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Thanks, > > > > Neha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > -- Guozhang > > > > > >
