Thanks Andrew for your feedback and interest on this feature. If there is no further feedback on this KIP (and no objection) I'll start the voting process soon.
Thanks. --Vahid From: Andrew Coates <big.andy.coa...@gmail.com> To: dev@kafka.apache.org Date: 08/10/2016 12:38 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-54 Sticky Partition Assignment Strategy I'm still very interested in seeing this KIP progress ... On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 at 20:09, Vahid S Hashemian <vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > I would like to revive this thread and ask for additional feedback on this > KIP. > > There have already been some feedback, mostly in favor, plus some concern > about the value gain considering the complexity and the semantics; i.e. > how the eventually revoked assignments need to be processed in the > onPartitionsAssigned() callback, and not in onPartitionsRevoked(). > > If it helps, I could also send a note to users mailing list about this KIP > and ask for their feedback. > I could also put the KIP up for a vote if that is expected at this point. > > Thanks. > --Vahid > > >
