Thanks for running the release and great to see the progress and focus on shipping a high-quality release. On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:06 PM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote:
> Hi Everyone, > > The code freeze is upon us! We've made incredible progress fixing bugs and > improving testing. If your feature or bug fix didn't get in this time, > don't worry since the next release will be here in a few short months. Now > the focus is on verifying the release candidates, the first of which will > be cut tomorrow. Only blocking bugs or significant regressions will result > in new release candidates. The goal is to have a stable release by Oct. 17. > > Thanks to everyone who has contributed thus far! > > -Jason > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Sriram Subramanian <r...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > Thanks Jason! > > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the update Jason. :) > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > Pardon all the JIRA noise, but I've been busy reducing the scope to > > match > > > > the available time since we're now 6 days from the code freeze. I've > > > pruned > > > > the list to about 30 tickets, some of which probably won't get in: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+0.10.1. > > > > Other > > > > than a few important bug fixes which are nearing completion, the main > > > > remaining items are documentation improvements, additional system > > tests, > > > > and transient test failures. If you are looking to help out, > addressing > > > the > > > > transient test failures are the biggest need since I'm sure you've > > > noticed > > > > all the build failures. Other than that, I think we're on track for > the > > > > code freeze. Keep up the great work! > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Mayuresh Gharat < > > > > gharatmayures...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Great ! > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Mayuresh > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Awesome! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Neha Narkhede < > n...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nice! > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:33 PM Ismael Juma < > ism...@juma.me.uk> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well done everyone. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 20 Sep 2016 5:23 am, "Jason Gustafson" < > ja...@confluent.io> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks everyone for the hard work! The 0.10.1 release > branch > > > has > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > created. We're now entering the stabilization phase of this > > > > release > > > > > > > which > > > > > > > > > means we'll focus on bug fixes and testing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Jason > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Jason Gustafson < > > > > > ja...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks everyone for the hard work! Here's an update on > the > > > > > > remaining > > > > > > > > KIPs > > > > > > > > > > that we are hoping to include: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > KIP-78 (clusterId): Review is basically complete. > Assuming > > no > > > > > > > problems > > > > > > > > > > emerge, Ismael is planning to merge today. > > > > > > > > > > KIP-74 (max fetch size): Review is nearing completion, > > just a > > > > few > > > > > > > minor > > > > > > > > > > issues remain. This will probably be merged tomorrow or > > > Sunday. > > > > > > > > > > KIP-55 (secure quotas): The patch has been rebased and > > > probably > > > > > > needs > > > > > > > > one > > > > > > > > > > more review pass before merging. Jun is confident it can > > get > > > in > > > > > > > before > > > > > > > > > > Monday. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As for KIP-79, I've made one review pass, but to make it > > in, > > > > > we'll > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > > 1) > > > > > > > > > > some more votes on the vote thread, and 2) a few review > > > > > iterations. > > > > > > > > It's > > > > > > > > > > looking a bit doubtful, but let's see how it goes! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since we are nearing the feature freeze, it would be > > helpful > > > if > > > > > > > people > > > > > > > > > > begin setting some priorities on the bugs that need to > get > > in > > > > > > before > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > code freeze. I am going to make an effort to prune the > list > > > > early > > > > > > > next > > > > > > > > > > week, so if there are any critical issues you know about, > > > make > > > > > sure > > > > > > > > they > > > > > > > > > > are marked as such. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Neha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > -Regards, > > > > > Mayuresh R. Gharat > > > > > (862) 250-7125 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Thanks, Neha
