I agree with Nacho.
+1 for the KIP.

Thanks,

Mayuresh

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Nacho Solis <nso...@linkedin.com.invalid>
wrote:

> I think a separate KIP is a good idea as well.  Note however that potential
> decisions in this KIP could affect the other KIP.
>
> Nacho
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Michael,
> >
> > Yes, doing a separate KIP to address the null payload issue for compacted
> > topics is a good idea.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Michael Pearce <michael.pea...@ig.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I had noted that what ever the solution having compaction based on null
> > > payload was agreed isn't elegant.
> > >
> > > Shall we raise another kip to : as discussed propose using a attribute
> > bit
> > > for delete/compaction flag as well/or instead of null value and
> updating
> > > compaction logic to look at that delelete/compaction attribute
> > >
> > > I believe this is less contentious, so that at least we get that done
> > > alleviating some concerns whilst the below gets discussed further?
> > >
> > > ________________________________________
> > > From: Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 8:56:52 PM
> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Kafka KIP meeting Oct 19 at 11:00am PST
> > >
> > > The following are the notes from today's KIP discussion.
> > >
> > >
> > >    - KIP-82 - add record header: We agreed that there are use cases for
> > >    third-party vendors building tools around Kafka. We haven't reached
> > the
> > >    conclusion whether the added complexity justifies the use cases. We
> > will
> > >    follow up on the mailing list with use cases, container format
> people
> > > have
> > >    been using, and details on the proposal.
> > >
> > >
> > > The video will be uploaded soon in https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals .
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jun
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, Everyone.,
> > > >
> > > > We plan to have a Kafka KIP meeting this coming Wednesday at 11:00am
> > PST.
> > > > If you plan to attend but haven't received an invite, please let me
> > know.
> > > > The following is the tentative agenda.
> > > >
> > > > Agenda:
> > > > KIP-82: add record header
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Jun
> > > >
> > > The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and
> for
> > > the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are
> not
> > > the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to
> > others
> > > this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by
> replying
> > > to this email or by telephone (+44(020 7896 0011) and then delete the
> > email
> > > and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusion (etc) that do not relate to
> > the
> > > official business of this company shall be understood as neither given
> > nor
> > > endorsed by it. IG is a trading name of IG Markets Limited (a company
> > > registered in England and Wales, company number 04008957) and IG Index
> > > Limited (a company registered in England and Wales, company number
> > > 01190902). Registered address at Cannon Bridge House, 25 Dowgate Hill,
> > > London EC4R 2YA. Both IG Markets Limited (register number 195355) and
> IG
> > > Index Limited (register number 114059) are authorised and regulated by
> > the
> > > Financial Conduct Authority.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Nacho (Ignacio) Solis
> Kafka
> nso...@linkedin.com
>



-- 
-Regards,
Mayuresh R. Gharat
(862) 250-7125

Reply via email to