+1 On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 3:44 AM, Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 at 08:07 Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > My only concern was around compatibility. It seems like the one case it > is > > incompatible would be, at worst, an extremely unusual edge case (and I > > *think* can be restricted further to "not source compatible for anyone > > extending the affected classes / interfaces and override affected > > methods"). > > > > -Ewen > > > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Xavier Léauté <xav...@confluent.io> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I would like to start the vote for KIP-100 unless there are any more > > > comments. > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > 100+-+Relax+Type+constraints+in+Kafka+Streams+API > > > > > > corresponding PR here https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/2205 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Xavier > > > > > >
