Yes, although it would have to be reviewed and merged by next Wednesday.

Ismael

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:17 AM, James Cheng <wushuja...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Ismael. Yes, you're right, PR 3799 is purely a refactoring.
>
> There are new subtasks of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3480
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3480> that I haven't yet
> filed, that I want to work on. They will add auto generation of metrics
> documentation for more areas of the codebase. So I was trying to figure out
> what were my chances of getting them into 1.0.0, to help me prioritize when
> I should work on them.
>
> But to your general point, it sounds like if I make my case and the
> community agrees that its worth the cost/benefit, that it might be eligible
> to get into 1.0.0. Sounds perfect. Thanks!
>
> -James
>
> > On Sep 20, 2017, at 3:14 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Hi James,
> >
> > Isn't PR 3799 purely a code refactoring (i.e. no change in behaviour)? If
> > so, it would probably land in trunk only after today. If it's new
> > functionality, then it depends on size, risk and importance. If you think
> > it's important and should target 1.0.0, feel free to make your case in
> the
> > JIRA or PR.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ismael
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:59 PM, James Cheng <wushuja...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi. I'm a little unclear on what types of things are subject to the
> >> "Feature Freeze" today (Sept 20th).
> >>
> >> For changes such as https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3799 <
> >> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3799> and
> https://issues.apache.org/
> >> jira/browse/KAFKA-3480 <https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/KAFKA-3480>
> >> that don't require KIPs, is today the freeze date? If I have PR created
> but
> >> not yet reviewed, does that mean it is eligible to get into 1.0.0?
> >>
> >> And if I have a PR that comes AFTER today, does that mean it is NOT
> >> eligible for 1.0.0?
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> -James
> >>
> >>> On Sep 11, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Sure! Please feel free to update the wiki.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Guozhang
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Rajini Sivaram <
> rajinisiva...@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Guozhang,
> >>>>
> >>>> Can KIP-188 be added to the list, please? The vote has passed and PR
> >> should
> >>>> be ready soon.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank you,
> >>>>
> >>>> Rajini
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Actually my bad, there is already a voting thread and you asked
> people
> >> to
> >>>>> recast a vote on a small change.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Tom,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It seems KIP-183 is still in the discussion phase, and voting has
> not
> >>>>> been
> >>>>>> started?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Guozhang
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Tom Bentley <t.j.bent...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Would it be possible to add KIP-183 to the list too, please?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Tom
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 6 September 2017 at 22:04, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi Vahid,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yes I have just added it while sending this email :)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Guozhang
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Vahid S Hashemian <
> >>>>>>>> vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Guozhang,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for the heads-up.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Can KIP-163 be added to the list?
> >>>>>>>>> The proposal for this KIP is accepted, and the PR is ready for
> >>>>> review.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>>>> --Vahid
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> From:   Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>> To:     "dev@kafka.apache.org" <dev@kafka.apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>> Date:   09/06/2017 01:45 PM
> >>>>>>>>> Subject:        1.0.0 KIPs Update
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hello folks,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> This is a heads up on 1.0.0 progress:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.a
> >>>>>>>>> pache.org_confluence_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D717649
> >>>>>>>>> 13&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_
> >>>>>>>>> xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=bLvgeykOujjty9joOuWXD4wZab
> >>>>>>>>> o1CV0pULY4eqBxqzk&s=90UN7ejzCQmdPOyRR_
> >>>> 2z304xLUSBCtOYi0KqhAo4EyU&e=
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> We have one week left towards the KIP deadline, which is Sept.
> >>>> 13th.
> >>>>>>>> There
> >>>>>>>>> are still a lot of KIPs that under discussion / voting process.
> >>>> For
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> KIP
> >>>>>>>>> proposer, please keep in mind that the voting has to be done
> >>>> before
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> deadline in order to be added into the coming release.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>> -- Guozhang
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> -- Guozhang
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> -- Guozhang
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> -- Guozhang
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> -- Guozhang
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to