The code freeze is 3rd of October, but the last week is only for bug fixes typically.
Ismael On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Note that the code freeze date is Oct.3, so people will have about two > weeks for that. > > > Guozhang > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > Yes, although it would have to be reviewed and merged by next Wednesday. > > > > Ismael > > > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:17 AM, James Cheng <wushuja...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Ismael. Yes, you're right, PR 3799 is purely a refactoring. > > > > > > There are new subtasks of https://issues.apache.org/ > > jira/browse/KAFKA-3480 > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3480> that I haven't yet > > > filed, that I want to work on. They will add auto generation of metrics > > > documentation for more areas of the codebase. So I was trying to figure > > out > > > what were my chances of getting them into 1.0.0, to help me prioritize > > when > > > I should work on them. > > > > > > But to your general point, it sounds like if I make my case and the > > > community agrees that its worth the cost/benefit, that it might be > > eligible > > > to get into 1.0.0. Sounds perfect. Thanks! > > > > > > -James > > > > > > > On Sep 20, 2017, at 3:14 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi James, > > > > > > > > Isn't PR 3799 purely a code refactoring (i.e. no change in > behaviour)? > > If > > > > so, it would probably land in trunk only after today. If it's new > > > > functionality, then it depends on size, risk and importance. If you > > think > > > > it's important and should target 1.0.0, feel free to make your case > in > > > the > > > > JIRA or PR. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ismael > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:59 PM, James Cheng <wushuja...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi. I'm a little unclear on what types of things are subject to the > > > >> "Feature Freeze" today (Sept 20th). > > > >> > > > >> For changes such as https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3799 < > > > >> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3799> and > > > https://issues.apache.org/ > > > >> jira/browse/KAFKA-3480 <https://issues.apache.org/ > > > jira/browse/KAFKA-3480> > > > >> that don't require KIPs, is today the freeze date? If I have PR > > created > > > but > > > >> not yet reviewed, does that mean it is eligible to get into 1.0.0? > > > >> > > > >> And if I have a PR that comes AFTER today, does that mean it is NOT > > > >> eligible for 1.0.0? > > > >> > > > >> Thanks! > > > >> > > > >> -James > > > >> > > > >>> On Sep 11, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Sure! Please feel free to update the wiki. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Guozhang > > > >>> > > > >>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > > rajinisiva...@gmail.com > > > >>> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Hi Guozhang, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Can KIP-188 be added to the list, please? The vote has passed and > PR > > > >> should > > > >>>> be ready soon. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thank you, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Rajini > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Guozhang Wang < > wangg...@gmail.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Actually my bad, there is already a voting thread and you asked > > > people > > > >> to > > > >>>>> recast a vote on a small change. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Guozhang Wang < > wangg...@gmail.com> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Hi Tom, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> It seems KIP-183 is still in the discussion phase, and voting > has > > > not > > > >>>>> been > > > >>>>>> started? > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Guozhang > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Tom Bentley < > > t.j.bent...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Would it be possible to add KIP-183 to the list too, please? > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Tom > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On 6 September 2017 at 22:04, Guozhang Wang < > wangg...@gmail.com> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Hi Vahid, > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Yes I have just added it while sending this email :) > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Guozhang > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Vahid S Hashemian < > > > >>>>>>>> vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Guozhang, > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for the heads-up. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Can KIP-163 be added to the list? > > > >>>>>>>>> The proposal for this KIP is accepted, and the PR is ready > for > > > >>>>> review. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks. > > > >>>>>>>>> --Vahid > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> From: Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>>>>> To: "dev@kafka.apache.org" <dev@kafka.apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>> Date: 09/06/2017 01:45 PM > > > >>>>>>>>> Subject: 1.0.0 KIPs Update > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hello folks, > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> This is a heads up on 1.0.0 progress: > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.a > > > >>>>>>>>> pache.org_confluence_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D717649 > > > >>>>>>>>> 13&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_ > > > >>>>>>>>> xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=bLvgeykOujjty9joOuWXD4wZab > > > >>>>>>>>> o1CV0pULY4eqBxqzk&s=90UN7ejzCQmdPOyRR_ > > > >>>> 2z304xLUSBCtOYi0KqhAo4EyU&e= > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> We have one week left towards the KIP deadline, which is > Sept. > > > >>>> 13th. > > > >>>>>>>> There > > > >>>>>>>>> are still a lot of KIPs that under discussion / voting > process. > > > >>>> For > > > >>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>> KIP > > > >>>>>>>>> proposer, please keep in mind that the voting has to be done > > > >>>> before > > > >>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>> deadline in order to be added into the coming release. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>>>>>> -- Guozhang > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>>> -- Guozhang > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>> -- Guozhang > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -- > > > >>>>> -- Guozhang > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> -- Guozhang > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > -- Guozhang >
