Hey community friends,

after another month of polishing, 
KIP-345<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-345%3A+Introduce+static+membership+protocol+to+reduce+consumer+rebalances>
 design is ready for vote. Feel free to add your comment on the discussion
thread or here.

Thanks for your time!

Boyang
________________________________
From: Boyang Chen <bche...@outlook.com>
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 6:35 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] KIP-345: Introduce static membership protocol to reduce 
consumer rebalances

Hey all,


thanks so much for all the inputs on KIP-345 so far. The original proposal has 
enhanced a lot with your help. To make sure the implementation go smoothly 
without back and forth, I would like to start a vote on the final design 
agreement now:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-345%3A+Introduce+static+membership+protocol+to+reduce+consumer+rebalances>

345%3A+Introduce+static+membership+protocol+to+reduce+consumer+rebalances<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-345%3A+Introduce+static+membership+protocol+to+reduce+consumer+rebalances>

KIP-345: Introduce static membership protocol to reduce 
...<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-345%3A+Introduce+static+membership+protocol+to+reduce+consumer+rebalances>
cwiki.apache.org
For stateful applications, one of the biggest performance bottleneck is the 
state shuffling. In Kafka consumer, there is a concept called "rebalance" which 
means that for given M partitions and N consumers in one consumer group, Kafka 
will try to balance the load between consumers and ideally have ...


Let me know if you have any questions.


Best,

Boyang

Reply via email to