+1 (binding)

On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 13:27, Adam Bellemare <adam.bellem...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding) from me. Looks like a pretty clear-cut case.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 1:11 AM Shawn Nguyen <shavvnnngu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the feedback Guozhang! I updated the KIP.
> >
> > In the meantime, could I ask for additional binding votes/approval on
> this
> > KIP proposal?
> >
> > Shawn
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 1:22 PM Liquan Pei <liquan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:51 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello Shawn,
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for the writeup. I've made a pass over it and here are some
> minor
> > >> comments:
> > >>
> > >> 1) As we discussed in the PR:
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5307
> > ,
> > >> the public APIs that we will add is
> > >>
> > >> In WindowedSerdes:
> > >> ```
> > >> static public <T> Serde<Windowed<T>>
> > timeWindowedChangelogSerdeFrom(final
> > >> Class<T> type, final long windowSize)
> > >> ```
> > >>
> > >> In TimeWindowedSerde
> > >> ```
> > >> TimeWindowedSerde forChangelog(final boolean);
> > >> ```
> > >>
> > >> Other classes such as WindowedKeySchema are internal classes for
> > >> implementation details and hence do not need to be listed in the wiki
> as
> > >> public APIs.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2) The wiki doc may reads a bit confusing for audience who are not
> > >> familiar
> > >> with the PR, since we mentioned the "forChangelog()" function and the
> > >> "isChangelog" parameter without clear definitions, but only explained
> > what
> > >> it is later in the docs as java code examples. I think rephrasing the
> > >> early
> > >> paragraphs to explain a bit more why we will add a new internal field
> > >> along
> > >> with a setter, its semantics (its default value and how
> deserialization
> > >> will be different depending on that) would be better.
> > >>
> > >> Otherwise, I'm +1 on the KIP, thanks!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Guozhang
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 8:18 AM Shawn Nguyen <shavvnnngu...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hey all,
> > >> >
> > >> > I wanted to start a vote on approval of KIP-393
> > >> > <
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-393%3A+Time+windowed+serde+to+properly+deserialize+changelog+input+topic
> > >> > >
> > >> > to
> > >> > fix the current time windowed serde for properly deserializing
> > changelog
> > >> > input topics. Let me know what you guys think.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Shawn
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> -- Guozhang
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Liquan Pei
> > > Software Engineer, Confluent Inc
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to