I just realized that there was a missing hole in the KIP, so I fixed it.
The draft implementation will be updated soon.

In short, the proposed change did not regard the case of the topic or
broker's 'compression.type' is 'producer'; in this case, the broker has to
handle all kinds of the supported codec. So I added additional options
(compression.[gzip,snappy,lz4, zstd].level, compression.[gzip,snappy,lz4,
zstd].buffer.size) with handling routines.

Please have a look when you are free.

Thanks,
Dongjin

On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:23 AM Dongjin Lee <dong...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks for pointing out Ismael. It's now updated.
>
> Best,
> Dongjin
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 4:36 AM Ismael Juma <isma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Dongjin. One minor suggestion: we should mention that the broker
>> side configs are also topic configs (i.e. can be set for a given topic).
>>
>> Ismael
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019, 10:37 AM Dongjin Lee <dong...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> > Happy new year.
>> >
>> > I just updated the title and contents of KIP and Jira issue, with
>> updated
>> > draft implementation. Now both of compression level and buffer size
>> options
>> > are available to producer and broker configuration. You can check the
>> > updated KIP from modified URL:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-390%3A+Allow+fine-grained+configuration+for+compression
>> >
>> > Please have a look when you are free.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Dongjin
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 12:50 AM Ismael Juma <isma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > The updated title sounds fine to me.
>> > >
>> > > Ismael
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, Dec 2, 2018, 5:25 AM Dongjin Lee <dong...@apache.org wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Ismael,
>> > > >
>> > > > Got it. Your direction is perfectly reasonable. I am now updating
>> the
>> > KIP
>> > > > document and the implementation.
>> > > >
>> > > > By allowing the buffer/block size to be configurable, it would be
>> > better
>> > > to
>> > > > update the title of the KIP like 'Allow fine-grained configuration
>> for
>> > > > compression'. Is that right?
>> > > >
>> > > > @Other committers:
>> > > >
>> > > > Is there any other opinion on allowing the buffer/block size to be
>> > > > configurable?
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Dongjin
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 1:45 AM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi Dongjin,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > To clarify, I mean a broker topic config with regards to point 1.
>> As
>> > > you
>> > > > > know, compression can be done by the producer and/or by the
>> broker.
>> > The
>> > > > > default is for the broker to just use whatever compression was
>> used
>> > by
>> > > > the
>> > > > > producer, but this can be changed by the user on a per topic
>> basis.
>> > It
>> > > > > seems like it would make sense for the configs to be . consistent
>> > > between
>> > > > > producer and broker.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > For point 2, I haven't looked at the implementation, but we could
>> do
>> > it
>> > > > in
>> > > > > the `CompressionType` enum by invoking the right constructor or
>> > > > retrieving
>> > > > > the default value via a constant (if defined). That's an
>> > implementation
>> > > > > detail and can be discussed in the PR. The more general point is
>> to
>> > > rely
>> > > > on
>> > > > > the library defaults instead of choosing one ourselves.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > For point 3, I'm in favour of doing that in this KIP.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Ismael
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 7:01 AM Dongjin Lee <dong...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Thank you Ismael, here are the answers:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > *1. About topic config*
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > After some consideration, I concluded that topic config doesn't
>> > need
>> > > to
>> > > > > > support compression.level. Here is why: since the compression is
>> > > > > conducted
>> > > > > > by the client, the one who can select the best compression
>> level is
>> > > the
>> > > > > > client itself. Let us assume that the compression level is set
>> at
>> > the
>> > > > > topic
>> > > > > > config level. In that case, there is a possibility that the
>> > > compression
>> > > > > > level is not optimal for some producers. Actually, Kafka's go
>> > client
>> > > > also
>> > > > > > supports compression level functionality for the producer config
>> > > only.
>> > > > > > <https://github.com/Shopify/sarama/blob/master/config.go>
>> (wait,
>> > do
>> > > we
>> > > > > > need
>> > > > > > to add this reasoning in the KIP, rejected alternatives
>> section?)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > *2. About default level*
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > As of current draft implementation, the default compression is
>> set
>> > on
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > CompressionType enum. Of course, changing this strategy into
>> > relying
>> > > > on a
>> > > > > > method from the library to pick the default compression level
>> seems
>> > > > > > possible, like `GZIPBlockOutputStream` does. In this case, we
>> need
>> > to
>> > > > add
>> > > > > > similar wrapper class for zstd and modify lz4 the wrapper also.
>> Add
>> > > to
>> > > > > > this, it seems like we need to explicitly state that we follow
>> the
>> > > > > default
>> > > > > > compression level of the codec in the documentation. Is this
>> what
>> > you
>> > > > > > intended?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > *3. Whether to allow the buffer/block size to be configurable*
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Well, As of current draft implementation, the lz4 level is
>> > > implemented
>> > > > as
>> > > > > > block size; this is caused by my misunderstanding on lz4. After
>> > > > reviewing
>> > > > > > lz4 today, I found that it also supports compression level of
>> 1~16
>> > > > > > (default: 1), not block size. I will fix it in this weekend by
>> > > updating
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > wrapper class.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > For the problem of the buffer/block size, I have no strong
>> opinion.
>> > > If
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > community needs it, I will do it all together. How do you think?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > In short, it seems like I need to update the KIP document for
>> issue
>> > > #1
>> > > > > and
>> > > > > > update the compression wrapper for issue #2, #3. Is this okay?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > Dongjin
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:34 AM Ismael Juma <isma...@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > >  Thanks for the KIP, this is helpful. A few questions:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > 1. Have we considered whether we want to allow a similar topic
>> > > > config?
>> > > > > > > 2. Can we rely on a method from the library to pick the
>> default
>> > > > > > compression
>> > > > > > > level if compression.level is not set? We do it for gzip and
>> it
>> > > would
>> > > > > > seem
>> > > > > > > reasonable to do something similar for the other compression
>> > > > libraries.
>> > > > > > > 3. Do we want to allow the buffer/block size to be
>> configurable?
>> > > This
>> > > > > has
>> > > > > > > an impact on memory usage and people may want to trade
>> > compression
>> > > > for
>> > > > > > > less/more memory in some cases. For example, the default for
>> LZ4
>> > is
>> > > > > 64KB
>> > > > > > > which is a bit high.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Ismael
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2018, 2:07 PM Dongjin Lee <dong...@apache.org
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hello dev,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I hope to initiate the discussion of KIP-390: Add producer
>> > option
>> > > > to
>> > > > > > > adjust
>> > > > > > > > compression level
>> > > > > > > > <
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-390%3A+Add+producer+option+to+adjust+compression+level
>> > > > > > > > >.
>> > > > > > > > All feedbacks will be highly appreciated.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Best,
>> > > > > > > > Dongjin
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > > > *Dongjin Lee*
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > *A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.*
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > *github:  <http://goog_969573159/>github.com/dongjinleekr
>> > > > > > > > <http://github.com/dongjinleekr>linkedin:
>> > > > > > > kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
>> > > > > > > > <http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>slideshare:
>> > > > > > > > www.slideshare.net/dongjinleekr
>> > > > > > > > <http://www.slideshare.net/dongjinleekr>*
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > *Dongjin Lee*
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > *A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.*
>> > > > > > *github:  <http://goog_969573159/>github.com/dongjinleekr
>> > > > > > <https://github.com/dongjinleekr>linkedin:
>> > > > > kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
>> > > > > > <https://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>speakerdeck:
>> > > > > > speakerdeck.com/dongjin
>> > > > > > <https://speakerdeck.com/dongjin>*
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > *Dongjin Lee*
>> > > >
>> > > > *A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.*
>> > > > *github:  <http://goog_969573159/>github.com/dongjinleekr
>> > > > <https://github.com/dongjinleekr>linkedin:
>> > > kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
>> > > > <https://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>speakerdeck:
>> > > > speakerdeck.com/dongjin
>> > > > <https://speakerdeck.com/dongjin>*
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Dongjin Lee*
>> >
>> > *A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.*
>> > *github:  <http://goog_969573159/>github.com/dongjinleekr
>> > <https://github.com/dongjinleekr>linkedin:
>> kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
>> > <https://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>speakerdeck:
>> > speakerdeck.com/dongjin
>> > <https://speakerdeck.com/dongjin>*
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> *Dongjin Lee*
>
> *A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.*
> *github:  <http://goog_969573159/>github.com/dongjinleekr
> <https://github.com/dongjinleekr>linkedin: kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
> <https://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>speakerdeck: speakerdeck.com/dongjin
> <https://speakerdeck.com/dongjin>*
>


-- 
*Dongjin Lee*

*A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.*
*github:  <http://goog_969573159/>github.com/dongjinleekr
<https://github.com/dongjinleekr>linkedin: kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
<https://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>speakerdeck: speakerdeck.com/dongjin
<https://speakerdeck.com/dongjin>*

Reply via email to