L.S., So the plan is to only change the group name for Karaf 1.x and change the package names as well for Karaf 2.x. Does it really make sense to do that in two steps? There are probably not that many projects out there at the moment that are using Karaf and actually refer to the Karaf packages (e.g. Camel only has a Karaf features descriptor). Why not bite the bullet and move everything over at once?
Regards, Gert Vanthienen ------------------------ Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ On 29 June 2010 16:30, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd like to release a 1.x version asap, but before doing so, I think > we should at least change the groupId of the various karaf artifacts, > so that it's clear the release has come from karaf and not felix. > For compatibility we should keep the package names though. > Given the change, i'm tempted to call it a 1.8.0 instead of 1.6.2 ... > Thoughts ? > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com >
