So we'd just forget 1.x and release a 2.0 from trunk asap ? Geronimo is using Karaf and have defined new commands and all. All those would have to be updated. ServiceMix also defines a bunch of commands. Let's hear from other, I don't have much problem releasing a 2.0 from trunk, though i would have loved including a bunch of enhancements on features for 2.0, but that could be deferred to 2.1 or later ...
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:49, Gert Vanthienen <[email protected]> wrote: > L.S., > > So the plan is to only change the group name for Karaf 1.x and change > the package names as well for Karaf 2.x. Does it really make sense to > do that in two steps? There are probably not that many projects out > there at the moment that are using Karaf and actually refer to the > Karaf packages (e.g. Camel only has a Karaf features descriptor). Why > not bite the bullet and move everything over at once? > > Regards, > > Gert Vanthienen > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ > > > > On 29 June 2010 16:30, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'd like to release a 1.x version asap, but before doing so, I think >> we should at least change the groupId of the various karaf artifacts, >> so that it's clear the release has come from karaf and not felix. >> For compatibility we should keep the package names though. >> Given the change, i'm tempted to call it a 1.8.0 instead of 1.6.2 ... >> Thoughts ? >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com >> > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
