+1; I've reopened KARAF-327 and set a target version for 2.1.3 too

kind regards,
andreas

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 06:13:19AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Achim,
> 
> yeah, agree. As it's a bug fix, it could be included in Karaf 2.1.3.
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> On 12/18/2010 08:37 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I might have another one which could be interesting for 2.1.3
> >that would be KARAF-327
> >
> >what do you think?
> >
> >
> >>I've reopend both and set release target also to 2.1.3
> >>
> >>Now we only have to fix them for 2.1.x :)
> >>
> >>kind regards,
> >>andreas
> >>
> >>On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:19:31AM +0100, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> >>>+1 for
> >>>
> >>>KARAF-282
> >>>KARAF-299
> >>>
> >>>2010/12/17 Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>>>Here's my point of view:
> >>>>
> >>>>KARAF-301: no interest to merge on 2.1.x. This issue concerns unit tests
> >>>>and it's more important for the trunk.
> >>>>KARAF-282: agree to merge on 2.1.x.
> >>>>KARAF-299: agree to merge on 2.1.x
> >>>>
> >>>>Regards
> >>>>JB
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>On 12/17/2010 12:47 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Ok, I've checked all issues fixed for 2.2.0. I think three issues may be
> >>>>>interesting for backporting:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>KARAF-301, KARAF-282, KARAF-299
> >>>>>
> >>>>>All other issues are already backported or not relevant for 2.1.x.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>While KARAF-301 is quite easy to backport, the other two does not apply
> >>>>>directly. KARAF-299 isn't that important (IMHO). KARAF-282 is not that
> >>>>>easy to
> >>>>>port, but is important since this issue also exists for 2.1.3-SNAPSHOT...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>WDYT?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>kind regards,
> >>>>>andreas
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Hey guys,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and also
> >>>>>>included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened (with
> >>>>>>already
> >>>>>>attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and add
> >>>>>>one or
> >>>>>>two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you want
> >>>>>>to
> >>>>>>include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>WDYT?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>kind regards,
> >>>>>>andreas
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>--
> >>>>Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>>>---------------------------------
> >>>>  HomePage
> >>>>http://www.nanthrax.net
> >>>>---------------------------------
> >>>>  Contacts
> >>>>[email protected]
> >>>>[email protected]
> >>>>---------------------------------
> >>>>  OpenSource
> >>>>BuildProcess/AutoDeploy
> >>>>http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
> >>>>Apache ServiceMix
> >>>>http://servicemix.apache.org
> >>>>-----------------------------------
> >>>>PGP : 17D4F086
> >>>>
> >
> 
> -- 
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> ---------------------------------
>  HomePage
> http://www.nanthrax.net
> ---------------------------------
>  Contacts
> [email protected]
> [email protected]
> ---------------------------------
>  OpenSource
> BuildProcess/AutoDeploy
> http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
> Apache ServiceMix
> http://servicemix.apache.org
> -----------------------------------
> PGP : 17D4F086

Attachment: pgpwI9vMqkKSG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to