Sounds good, so just KARAF-343 left in the todo list :)

I'll start preparing my environment for a run at a Karaf 2.1.3 release
candidate.

On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
> The problem for not including new features is to reduce the risk of
> regressions and incompatbilities.
> I'd think this can be deferred to 2.2.0.
>
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 13:40, Jamie G. <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Another issue appeared under the 2.1.x JIRA, KARAF-353. It's not
>> actually a bug, it's a feature request. The feature the user is
>> requesting doesn't sound like it would break backwards compatibility
>> however it does go against our general 'only bug fixes' stance on
>> patch branches. WDYT?
>>
>> Jamie
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I have a local fix for the fileinstall problem, so i'll start a new
>>> release for that one on monday too.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:10, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> ok, thanks
>>>>
>>>> kind regards,
>>>> andreas
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 07:10:12PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>> I haven't had any time to investigate the fileinstall issue, but the
>>>>> fileinstall version has a few important problems that should really be
>>>>> fixed.
>>>>> I'll investigate on monday too.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:33, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:16:54PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>> >> On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> 
>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>> >> > Ok, I've fixed most of the issues assigned to karaf-2.1.x release by 
>>>>> >> > now. Things
>>>>> >> > missing:
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > KARAF-333: waiting for the paxurl release here (the paxurl release 
>>>>> >> > fails for me;
>>>>> >> > gnodet can you do this please?)
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> I'll do that on monday.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > thank you very much; btw if you have any idea y the original artifacts 
>>>>> > are not
>>>>> > installing the signed file I would also be very thankful :)
>>>>> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > KARAF-343: seams to be a "wont fix"? WDYT
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Which one is that?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Felix Fileinstall upgrade; this also fails for Achim
>>>>> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > KARAF-344: I'll take a look at it later this day
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > --> Anything else to do? Otherwise I think we can fix a release date 
>>>>> >> > for 2.1 (when
>>>>> >> > ppl are comming back to work after new year's parties :))
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > WDYT?
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > kind regards,
>>>>> >> > andreas
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:09:15PM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>> >> >> Hey guys,
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> How do you feel about releasing karaf-2.1.3? We've fixed 6 bugs and 
>>>>> >> >> also
>>>>> >> >> included 2 minor improvements till now. 2 Bugs are still opened 
>>>>> >> >> (with already
>>>>> >> >> attached patches). I'm goging to give KARAF-315 a shot tomorrow and 
>>>>> >> >> add one or
>>>>> >> >> two minor improvements to the integration tests. Anything else you 
>>>>> >> >> want to
>>>>> >> >> include? Anything else we should do before releasing karaf-2.1.3?
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> WDYT?
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> kind regards,
>>>>> >> >> andreas
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> --
>>>>> >> Cheers,
>>>>> >> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>> >> ------------------------
>>>>> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >> ------------------------
>>>>> >> Open Source SOA
>>>>> >> http://fusesource.com
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>

Reply via email to