On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 02:24:22PM +0100, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > Hi, > > first hope you guys had some good holidays :) > > concerning the latest version of pax-web I really would love to use > the latest snapshot version on trunk of karaf. > But we currently have not snapshot versions available on any maven repo :(
small correction here: hudson pushes all builds to apache snapshot repo; karafs latest version (trunk/snapshot) can be found here [1] [1] http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/karaf/ > > second, yes the pax configuration overrides the configuration of the > jetty xml. > But just the ones that are passed to jetty by pax. All specialized > configurations > jaas as example are only configurable through the jetty xml. > > hope that helped a bit :) > > Am 23.12.2010 14:13, schrieb Charles Moulliard: > >I found my mistake. I should use the same port number as defined in > >jetty.xml config file > > > >In fact, no new instance is created but pax-web use jetty.xml config > >if define and override the parameters provided to karaf (port 8181 by > >example) > > > > > >On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Guillaume Nodet<[email protected]> wrote: > >>Achim has much more experience on using jetty in Karaf than me, so > >>hopefully he can share some infos. > >> > >>On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 13:42, Charles Moulliard<[email protected]> > >>wrote: > >>>pax-web 0.8.2 will be required because pax-web-jetty must import > >>>classes org.eclipse.jetty.jaas packages for the bundle and those > >>>classes are not included in pax-web 0.8.1 MANIFEST.mf file > >>> > >>>According to the first test that I made, I can register a new jetty > >>>server using /etc/jetty.xml file but the kareaf webconsole defined > >>>with port 8181 does not respond... > >>> > >>> > >>>On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Guillaume Nodet<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>Sure. Just make sure you associate the commit with a JIRA issue. > >>>> > >>>>On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:28, Charles Moulliard<[email protected]> > >>>>wrote: > >>>>>Can I update the pom + feature file ? > >>>>> > >>>>>On 23/12/10 12:15, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >>>>>>Definitely, we should upgrade to the latest version. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>On Thursday, December 23, 2010, Charles Moulliard<[email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>Hi, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>I would like to know if it is planned to include pax-web 0.8.1 in karaf > >>>>>>>2.2.0 ? I'm interested by this version as it allows to provide > >>>>>>>additional > >>>>>>>parameters for jetty in jetty.xml and configure the location of this > >>>>>>>file > >>>>>>>using config admin or system property > >>>>>>>(http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-193) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Regards, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Charles > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>-- > >>>>Cheers, > >>>>Guillaume Nodet > >>>>------------------------ > >>>>Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > >>>>------------------------ > >>>>Open Source SOA > >>>>http://fusesource.com > >>>> > >> > >> > >>-- > >>Cheers, > >>Guillaume Nodet > >>------------------------ > >>Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > >>------------------------ > >>Open Source SOA > >>http://fusesource.com > >> >
pgpuQWzUzkHlu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
