That was my hope too :) I'm longing for a nightly build for the ops4j stuff :)
> Oha, I've read the mail bottom up and not top down :) Nevermind, I think > we'll have pax > snapshots available the moment the new build server is available @ops4j.org; > and > I hope the server is available soon :) > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 02:39:04PM +0100, Achim Nierbeck wrote: >> Am 27.12.2010 14:35, schrieb Andreas Pieber: >>> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 02:24:22PM +0100, Achim Nierbeck wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> first hope you guys had some good holidays :) >>>> >>>> concerning the latest version of pax-web I really would love to use >>>> the latest snapshot version on trunk of karaf. >>>> But we currently have not snapshot versions available on any maven repo :( >>> small correction here: hudson pushes all builds to apache snapshot repo; >>> karafs >>> latest version (trunk/snapshot) can be found here [1] >>> >>> [1] http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/karaf/ >> I know for karaf, but for pax-web we don't have any snapshot repo, >> which is the main issue for other >> people testing all the stuff i did on pax web :) >> >>>> second, yes the pax configuration overrides the configuration of the >>>> jetty xml. >>>> But just the ones that are passed to jetty by pax. All specialized >>>> configurations >>>> jaas as example are only configurable through the jetty xml. >>>> >>>> hope that helped a bit :) >>>> >>>> Am 23.12.2010 14:13, schrieb Charles Moulliard: >>>>> I found my mistake. I should use the same port number as defined in >>>>> jetty.xml config file >>>>> >>>>> In fact, no new instance is created but pax-web use jetty.xml config >>>>> if define and override the parameters provided to karaf (port 8181 by >>>>> example) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Guillaume Nodet<[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Achim has much more experience on using jetty in Karaf than me, so >>>>>> hopefully he can share some infos. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 13:42, Charles Moulliard<[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> pax-web 0.8.2 will be required because pax-web-jetty must import >>>>>>> classes org.eclipse.jetty.jaas packages for the bundle and those >>>>>>> classes are not included in pax-web 0.8.1 MANIFEST.mf file >>>>>>> >>>>>>> According to the first test that I made, I can register a new jetty >>>>>>> server using /etc/jetty.xml file but the kareaf webconsole defined >>>>>>> with port 8181 does not respond... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Guillaume Nodet<[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Sure. Just make sure you associate the commit with a JIRA issue. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:28, Charles Moulliard<[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Can I update the pom + feature file ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 23/12/10 12:15, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Definitely, we should upgrade to the latest version. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, December 23, 2010, Charles >>>>>>>>>> Moulliard<[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I would like to know if it is planned to include pax-web 0.8.1 in >>>>>>>>>>> karaf >>>>>>>>>>> 2.2.0 ? I'm interested by this version as it allows to provide >>>>>>>>>>> additional >>>>>>>>>>> parameters for jetty in jetty.xml and configure the location of >>>>>>>>>>> this file >>>>>>>>>>> using config admin or system property >>>>>>>>>>> (http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-193) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Charles >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet >>>>>>>> ------------------------ >>>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>>> ------------------------ >>>>>>>> Open Source SOA >>>>>>>> http://fusesource.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Guillaume Nodet >>>>>> ------------------------ >>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>>>>> ------------------------ >>>>>> Open Source SOA >>>>>> http://fusesource.com >>>>>>
