Hi David,
my proposal was more to use:
mvn:org.apache.karaf.features/standard/2.2.0/xml/features
mvn:org.apache.karaf.features/enterprise/2.2.0/xml/features
more than
mvn:org.apache.karaf.assemblies.features/standard/2.2.0/xml/features
mvn:org.apache.karaf.assemblies.features/enterprise/2.2.0/xml/features
I think it's more "logical".
The groupId containing assemblies is more for our usage but I don't
think it's a "good" groupId for the users.
WDYT ?
Regards
JB
On 03/05/2011 08:16 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I seem to recall that for real artifacts maven supports some kind of "your artifact
is now located here...." file for obsolete locations. Is there any chance the mvn
url handler supports something like that and we can just point from the old location to
the new one?
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 4, 2011, at 11:05 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
On Karaf "previous" versions, such as Karaf 2.1.3 or 2.1.4, the features
descriptor was in mvn:org.apache.karaf/apache-karaf/2.1.4/xml/features
Now, starting with 2.2.0 version, with the assemblies refactoring, the features
are in mvn:org.apache.karaf.assemblies.features/standard/2.2.0/xml/features.
I think it could be confusing for the users.
What do you think to use
mvn:org.apache.karaf/apache-karaf/2.2.1/xml/standard-features,
mvn:org.apache.karaf/apache-karaf/2.2.1/xml/enterprise-features ?
I don't want to change the maven modules structure (having assemblies/features
is clearer for the developers), but I take my user cap and I think it could
make sense to be as closest as possible of the previous features descriptor
locations.
Thoughts ?
Thanks
Regards
JB
