I don't think the pax-url-handler for maven supports those redirections. Fwiw, we can rename the groupId without changing the svn layout, both do not have to be necessarily tied ...
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 08:29, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey JB, > > basically +1, but > > a) another rename? :) > b) we had soemthing like this already but decided to use assemblies > instead of plain features because all "real" Karaf features are there > already. > > But big +1 for Davids idea to add relocated information here. I've > found an introduction here [1], but I'm not sure how to do it since > only the features.xml has been moved and not the entire package... > > Kind regards, > Andreas > > [1] http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-relocation.html > > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> my proposal was more to use: >> >> mvn:org.apache.karaf.features/standard/2.2.0/xml/features >> mvn:org.apache.karaf.features/enterprise/2.2.0/xml/features >> >> more than >> >> mvn:org.apache.karaf.assemblies.features/standard/2.2.0/xml/features >> mvn:org.apache.karaf.assemblies.features/enterprise/2.2.0/xml/features >> >> I think it's more "logical". >> The groupId containing assemblies is more for our usage but I don't think >> it's a "good" groupId for the users. >> >> WDYT ? >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> >> On 03/05/2011 08:16 AM, David Jencks wrote: >>> >>> I seem to recall that for real artifacts maven supports some kind of "your >>> artifact is now located here...." file for obsolete locations. Is there any >>> chance the mvn url handler supports something like that and we can just >>> point from the old location to the new one? >>> >>> thanks >>> david jencks >>> >>> On Mar 4, 2011, at 11:05 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> On Karaf "previous" versions, such as Karaf 2.1.3 or 2.1.4, the features >>>> descriptor was in mvn:org.apache.karaf/apache-karaf/2.1.4/xml/features >>>> >>>> Now, starting with 2.2.0 version, with the assemblies refactoring, the >>>> features are in >>>> mvn:org.apache.karaf.assemblies.features/standard/2.2.0/xml/features. >>>> >>>> I think it could be confusing for the users. >>>> >>>> What do you think to use >>>> mvn:org.apache.karaf/apache-karaf/2.2.1/xml/standard-features, >>>> mvn:org.apache.karaf/apache-karaf/2.2.1/xml/enterprise-features ? >>>> >>>> I don't want to change the maven modules structure (having >>>> assemblies/features is clearer for the developers), but I take my user cap >>>> and I think it could make sense to be as closest as possible of the >>>> previous >>>> features descriptor locations. >>>> >>>> Thoughts ? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>> >> > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
