Hi Christian,
I personally pefer the osgi:list output, :-)
Freeman
On 2011-7-8, at 下午6:52, Christian Schneider wrote:
Hi all
while implementing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-561
I found that I do not like the look of our current table output like
in osgi:list too much.
Currently it looks like this:
ID State Blueprint Level Name
[ 0] [Active ] [ ] [ 0] System Bundle (3.2.1)
[ 1] [Active ] [ ] [ 5] OPS4J Pax Url - aether:
(1.3.4)
[ 2] [Active ] [ ] [ 5] OPS4J Pax Url - wrap:
(1.3.4)
[ 3] [Active ] [ ] [ 8] OPS4J Pax Logging -
Service (1.6.3)
[ 4] [Active ] [ ] [ 8] OPS4J Pax Logging - API
(1.6.3)
[ 5] [Active ] [ ] [ 10] Apache Felix
Configuration Admin Service (1.2.8)
For obr:list I experimented with the following:
| NAME | SYMBOLIC
NAME | VERSION |
| dm Kernel OSGi Spring DM Fragment |
com.springsource.kernel.kerneldmfragment | 2.0.1.RELEASE |
| dm Kernel OSGi Spring DM Fragment |
com.springsource.kernel.kerneldmfragment | 2.0.2.RELEASE |
| dm Kernel OSGi Spring DM Fragment |
com.springsource.kernel.kerneldmfragment | 2.0.3.RELEASE |
I think that looks much cleaner.
What do you think? Even more ideas?
Christian
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------
Freeman Fang
FuseSource
Email:[email protected]
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
