I'm with Freeman, I rather like the way the list looks right now, and if you are in need of the symbolic name you still can use the -s param.
regards, Achim 2011/7/8 Freeman Fang <[email protected]>: > Hi Christian, > > I personally pefer the osgi:list output, :-) > > Freeman > On 2011-7-8, at 下午6:52, Christian Schneider wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> while implementing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-561 >> I found that I do not like the look of our current table output like in >> osgi:list too much. >> >> Currently it looks like this: >> ID State Blueprint Level Name >> [ 0] [Active ] [ ] [ 0] System Bundle (3.2.1) >> [ 1] [Active ] [ ] [ 5] OPS4J Pax Url - aether: >> (1.3.4) >> [ 2] [Active ] [ ] [ 5] OPS4J Pax Url - wrap: (1.3.4) >> [ 3] [Active ] [ ] [ 8] OPS4J Pax Logging - Service >> (1.6.3) >> [ 4] [Active ] [ ] [ 8] OPS4J Pax Logging - API >> (1.6.3) >> [ 5] [Active ] [ ] [ 10] Apache Felix Configuration >> Admin Service (1.2.8) >> >> For obr:list I experimented with the following: >> | NAME | SYMBOLIC NAME >> | VERSION | >> | dm Kernel OSGi Spring DM Fragment | >> com.springsource.kernel.kerneldmfragment | 2.0.1.RELEASE | >> | dm Kernel OSGi Spring DM Fragment | >> com.springsource.kernel.kerneldmfragment | 2.0.2.RELEASE | >> | dm Kernel OSGi Spring DM Fragment | >> com.springsource.kernel.kerneldmfragment | 2.0.3.RELEASE | >> >> I think that looks much cleaner. >> >> What do you think? Even more ideas? >> >> Christian >> >> -- >> >> Christian Schneider >> http://www.liquid-reality.de >> >> Open Source Architect >> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com >> > > --------------------------------------------- > Freeman Fang > > FuseSource > Email:[email protected] > Web: fusesource.com > Twitter: freemanfang > Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > > > -- -- *Achim Nierbeck* Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead
