Filters could be set on the header that way and that way. It should be independent if you set a filter for [webconsole] or (karaf-webconsole/trunk OR karaf-webconsole/branches OR karaf-webconsole/tags). But as said; I wouldn't mind if there is an additional tag in the subject. I'm just curious if it's worth the afford to keep them up-to-date/into place.
Kind regards, Andreas On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:57, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > the main advantage is to be able to filter message coming into dev mailing > list, dedicated on subprojects. > > Regards > JB > > > On 08/19/2011 10:53 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote: > >> I'm not so sure about this. While I wont be against it it's just that >> we'll >> have to request this from infra for each new snapshot/subproject. I'm not >> sure how other mail clients handle this but for google filter it works >> e.g. >> quite well to tag those messages according to their pathes differently. >> >> --> If someone would like to do the work +1 >> otherwise I wouldn't mind either >> >> Kind regards, >> Andreas >> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 08:13, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> +1 >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> >>> On 08/18/2011 10:27 PM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote: >>> >>> Hey, >>>> What do you think about adding prefix to topics which are for >>>> sub-projects? For example [cellar] or [cave]? It will make much easier >>>> to >>>> navigate over tons of mails. Karaf-related topics will still have no >>>> prefix. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Lukasz >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> [email protected] >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >>> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
