Agree,
I think just a prefix on the subjet is largely enough.
My 2 cents ;)
Regards
JB
On 08/19/2011 11:09 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
Filters could be set on the header that way and that way. It should be
independent if you set a filter for [webconsole] or (karaf-webconsole/trunk
OR karaf-webconsole/branches OR karaf-webconsole/tags). But as said; I
wouldn't mind if there is an additional tag in the subject. I'm just curious
if it's worth the afford to keep them up-to-date/into place.
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:57, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Andreas,
the main advantage is to be able to filter message coming into dev mailing
list, dedicated on subprojects.
Regards
JB
On 08/19/2011 10:53 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
I'm not so sure about this. While I wont be against it it's just that
we'll
have to request this from infra for each new snapshot/subproject. I'm not
sure how other mail clients handle this but for google filter it works
e.g.
quite well to tag those messages according to their pathes differently.
--> If someone would like to do the work +1
otherwise I wouldn't mind either
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 08:13, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]>
wrote:
+1
Regards
JB
On 08/18/2011 10:27 PM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote:
Hey,
What do you think about adding prefix to topics which are for
sub-projects? For example [cellar] or [cave]? It will make much easier
to
navigate over tons of mails. Karaf-related topics will still have no
prefix.
Regards,
Lukasz
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
