I checked they subsystem spec before I made my entry. In the spec, their example uses a period-delimited name. However, the spec does not mandate that usage.
David Jencks wrote: > > On Oct 13, 2011, at 8:55 AM, Ioannis Canellos wrote: > >> Hi David, >> >> The fact that the features you mentioned are provided by the Karaf >> doesn't >> mean that we need to prefix them with karaf. >> For example we can only use the project that implements those features >> and >> end up with something like this: >> >> aries-jndi >> aries-tx >> spring-tx >> camel-jpa >> karaf-webconsole >> >> wdyt? > > Absolutely not. If geronimo wants to use a different selection of bundles > for an aries-jndi feature it should be able to without any difference in > naming convention. > > I'd check the subsystem spec to see what they plan to use. The sample > subsystems I've seen all use a bsn-like name. > > thanks > david jencks > >> >> -- >> *Ioannis Canellos* >> * >> FuseSource <http://fusesource.com> >> >> ** >> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com >> ** >> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >> Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer >> Apache Gora <http://incubator.apache.org/gora/> Committer >> * > ----- Mike Van Mike Van's Open Source Technologies Blog NCI, Inc. Atraxia Technologes -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/feature-names-are-potentially-ambiguous-tp3263950p3420297.html Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
