+1 for reverting to a more user-friendly naming, I kinda like the "project shortname"-"feature" syntax like karaf-obr or the like
regards, Achim 2011/10/13 Ioannis Canellos <[email protected]> > > > > I think we should revert the name (I will do it if all are agree). If, as > > David said, some feature name are ambiguous (for instance jndi), I have > no > > problem to change to more descriptive name (for instance, > aries-jndi-service > > or whatever). > > > > Yes, I agree on that and I think that Daniel mentioned that as a naming > convention. > -- > *Ioannis Canellos* > * > FuseSource <http://fusesource.com> > > ** > Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com > ** > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer > Apache Gora <http://incubator.apache.org/gora/> Committer > * > -- -- *Achim Nierbeck* Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
