If this is for Karaf 3 then I'd be happy to see things change up to 120 or 160 (depending on the consensus of the community). For older branches I'd tend to continue our style convention for clarity and conformity.
Cheers, Jamie On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > I could even go to 160 :-) > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 03:46, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I do agree, but 120 sounds more reasonable to me. >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 03:44, Jamie G. <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Where would we put the limit too if we extend it? >>> >>> There is something to be said about cleanly structured code, it would >>> be nice not to have 500 char lines ;) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Jamie >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Can we get rid of the 80 chars per line max in code ? >>> > We're not in the 90s whith 640x480 screens anymore. I don't see the >>> value >>> > of losing 2/3 of my screen to follow this silly limitation. >>> > Thoughts? >>> > >>> > -- >>> > ------------------------ >>> > Guillaume Nodet >>> > ------------------------ >>> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>> > ------------------------ >>> > Open Source SOA >>> > http://fusesource.com >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> ------------------------ >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com >> >> > > > -- > ------------------------ > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com >
