On Thursday, November 10, 2011 3:46:17 AM Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I do agree, but 120 sounds more reasonable to me.
I agree that 120 seems reasonable. CXF has always used 110 which I *personally* like, but 120 is reasonable. On my machine, I don't run Eclipse full screen, it only covers about 2/3's of the screen. Of the eclipse window, the workspace/package pane covers about 1/5 of the width leaving the editor showing 112 characters. Thus, I think anything in the 110-125 range would be reasonable. 160 would be way too much IMO. Dan > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 03:44, Jamie G. <[email protected]> wrote: > > Where would we put the limit too if we extend it? > > > > There is something to be said about cleanly structured code, it would > > be nice not to have 500 char lines ;) > > > > Cheers, > > Jamie > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Can we get rid of the 80 chars per line max in code ? > > > We're not in the 90s whith 640x480 screens anymore. I don't see the > > > > value > > > > > of losing 2/3 of my screen to follow this silly limitation. > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > -- > > > ------------------------ > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > ------------------------ > > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > > ------------------------ > > > Open Source SOA > > > http://fusesource.com -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://dankulp.com/blog Talend - http://www.talend.com
