Hi guys,
let me try to summarise the different options:
- include in Karaf: it's not a good idea as the commands scope is not
purely container related
- include in a Karaf sub-project (as Karaf Extra on google, or a pure
sub-project as Cellar, WebConsole, Cave and EIK). Pros: we control/are
the community, the release cycle, etc. Cons: it's more difficult for
others communities to join and contribute.
- include in a KarafEE. It means in OpenEJB. It makes sense but we are
not involved in the OpenEJB community. More over, KarafEE is new and a
"lot" of stuff should be done
- include in Geronimo. Geronimo already use Karaf and some of us are
involved in the Geronimo communities. It could be interesting but it
means that we should be more involved in the Geronimo community.
- include in ServiceMix. We are most of all involved in the ServiceMix
community. It could be a good location even if it's not the core purpose
of ServiceMix.
Regards
JB
On 01/16/2012 11:21 PM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote:
Hey all,
I would opt for some from Apache repositories too, since we all have access to
them. I preffer a ServiceMix as destination project because from following
reasons:
1) We have more Karaf commiters in ServiceMix than in any other project listed
before
2) Our communities in past was strictly connected and we still cooperate very
well
3) It looks like an application server domain but it don't have to be - exposed
connection factory can point to external IBM MQ or Oracle broker
4) ServiceMix can still be used with Geronimo, and these commands, if we'll
keep dependencies clear, can be part of Geronimo distribution to
Only one problem we have is a big question mark regarding SMX5 project scope
discussed few months before. If it still be a OSGi ready or not. But so far
development on 5th release is almost nothing and we can focus on SMX4 and OSGi
doing some improvements for community eg in ServiceMix 4.4. That can proof that
OSGi is the best choice for runtime. :)
Gute nacht
Łukasz Dywicki
--
Code-House
http://code-house.org
Wiadomość napisana przez Ioannis Canellos w dniu 2012-01-16, o godz. 19:47:
I think the most appropriate place for this kind of stuff is geronimo
since the general idea for geronimo is to provide EE funcionality that
elaborates other projects.
Yeah, Geronimo would be a great place too, as long as it can provide a
feature descriptor that would allow its use in plain Karaf. But I really
don't think that this would be a problem.
--
*Ioannis Canellos*
*
FuseSource<http://fusesource.com>
**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Apache Karaf<http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer& PMC
Apache Camel<http://camel.apache.org/> Committer
Apache ServiceMix<http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer
Apache Gora<http://incubator.apache.org/gora/> Committer
Apache DirectMemory<http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/> Committer
*
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
