+1 on both, basically I think it's a good idea to collect stuff for an upcoming 4.0 Karaf that will be available as a R5 Container and also a Future that can not really be placed right now to a 3.0/4.0 or what so ever. Just that we don't loos track of them. Every now and then we should take a look at those though to make sure we don't miss anything for a 3.5 and so forth :)
regards, Achim 2012/3/15 Jamie G. <[email protected]>: > Interesting idea - so future wouldn't be tied to any specific Karaf > version. Just a place holder for "it would be nice to XYZ when the > tech is available"? That would be useful. > > Cheers, > Jamie > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: >> +1 >> >> More than 4.0.0, I would create a version "Future" in Jira. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> >> On 03/15/2012 04:01 PM, Jamie G. wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> As there is already some discussion surrounding the next major OSGi >>> core specification, in anticipation I think we should consider adding >>> to our project Jira a place holder for Karaf version 4.0.0. >>> >>> Version 4.0.0 of Karaf would be for Karaf centring around OSGi R5. >>> Karaf 3.x currently is centred on OSGi 4.3, while Karaf 2.x continues >>> to focus on OSGi R4.2. I believe having this roadmap would help make >>> the forward progress of Karaf a little clearer to our users. >>> >>> The above being said, our community focus is still on Karaf 3.0.0. I >>> think just having a version place holder in Jira now will allow us to >>> enter issues related to OSGi R5 when required. >>> >>> Any thoughts? >>> >>> [1] http://www.osgi.org/blog/ >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Jamie >> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> [email protected] >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
