+1, the future is difficult to see clearly ;) I'd be happy with a 'future' version tag.
Cheers, Jamie On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, as we don't have an "exact" version target for OSGi R5 update (it > could be in Karaf 4.0.0, but maybe in 3.5.0, or maybe in 5.0.0 ;)), Future > is a container for a long term roadmap. > > Regards > JB > > > On 03/15/2012 04:05 PM, Jamie G. wrote: >> >> Interesting idea - so future wouldn't be tied to any specific Karaf >> version. Just a place holder for "it would be nice to XYZ when the >> tech is available"? That would be useful. >> >> Cheers, >> Jamie >> >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> More than 4.0.0, I would create a version "Future" in Jira. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> >>> On 03/15/2012 04:01 PM, Jamie G. wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> As there is already some discussion surrounding the next major OSGi >>>> core specification, in anticipation I think we should consider adding >>>> to our project Jira a place holder for Karaf version 4.0.0. >>>> >>>> Version 4.0.0 of Karaf would be for Karaf centring around OSGi R5. >>>> Karaf 3.x currently is centred on OSGi 4.3, while Karaf 2.x continues >>>> to focus on OSGi R4.2. I believe having this roadmap would help make >>>> the forward progress of Karaf a little clearer to our users. >>>> >>>> The above being said, our community focus is still on Karaf 3.0.0. I >>>> think just having a version place holder in Jira now will allow us to >>>> enter issues related to OSGi R5 when required. >>>> >>>> Any thoughts? >>>> >>>> [1] http://www.osgi.org/blog/ >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Jamie >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> [email protected] >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com
