@JB +1; except that I think that we should not break backward compatibility in the 2.x line --> 2.3 1.5/1.6/1.7 (--> +1 to Ioannis) @Achim: +1, sounds fine
Kind regards, Andreas On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 13:15, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > We need to keep 2.3.x for compatible features or improvements. > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:47, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> as you probably saw, Guillaume created the karaf-2.3.x branch. >> We started to move Jira issues on the "correct" branches. >> >> I propose the following guidelines for the different branches: >> - karaf-2.2.x is only for bug fixes: no refactoring, no new features, no >> enhancements, only bug fixes >> - karaf-2.3.x is for bug fixes and new features. It's a kind of mix >> between 3.0.0 and 2.2.x. Most of the 3.0.0 features will be there (OSGi >> r4.3), but not sub-shell, and pax-url-mvn (not aether). >> - trunk (3.0.0) includes OSGi r4.3 (and related OSGi frameworks), >> sub-shell, pax-url-aether, etc. >> >> Does it sound good for you ? >> >> Regards >> JB >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> [email protected] >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > > > > -- > ------------------------ > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > FuseSource, Integration everywhere > http://fusesource.com
