It makes sense guys.
The purpose is to share the same vision on the branches ;)
I will create a wiki page to describe it.
Regards
JB
On 04/10/2012 01:52 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
@JB +1; except that I think that we should not break backward
compatibility in the 2.x line --> 2.3 1.5/1.6/1.7 (--> +1 to Ioannis)
@Achim: +1, sounds fine
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 13:15, Guillaume Nodet<[email protected]> wrote:
We need to keep 2.3.x for compatible features or improvements.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:47, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
as you probably saw, Guillaume created the karaf-2.3.x branch.
We started to move Jira issues on the "correct" branches.
I propose the following guidelines for the different branches:
- karaf-2.2.x is only for bug fixes: no refactoring, no new features, no
enhancements, only bug fixes
- karaf-2.3.x is for bug fixes and new features. It's a kind of mix
between 3.0.0 and 2.2.x. Most of the 3.0.0 features will be there (OSGi
r4.3), but not sub-shell, and pax-url-mvn (not aether).
- trunk (3.0.0) includes OSGi r4.3 (and related OSGi frameworks),
sub-shell, pax-url-aether, etc.
Does it sound good for you ?
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
FuseSource, Integration everywhere
http://fusesource.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
