I'm curious, do we plan to do beta and/or alpha releases? Maybe after cutting the stabilisation branch it might be a good idea to cut a beta? I know we had those discussions some time ago; nevertheless Karaf-3 is PRETTY, VERY, VERY, VERY big in changes... so a beta might be a good idea in this special case... don't you think?
Kind regards, Andreas On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Romain Gilles <[email protected]> wrote: > That's interesting. I have plan to switch to 3.0 as soon as an alpha will be > available. > > Thanks, > > Romain > > Le mardi 22 mai 2012, Christian Schneider a écrit : > >> For Karaf 3 we already joined the distros. >> >> Christian >> >> Am 22.05.2012 11:04, schrieb Romain Gilles: >> >> Thank you. >> Then I will build a distribution that join the both ;) >> >> Romain. >> >> Le mardi 22 mai 2012, Achim Nierbeck a écrit : >>> >>> As you just guessed it, the difference is just the launchers and the >>> file modes :) >>> >>> regards, Achim >>> >>> 2012/5/22 Romain Gilles <[email protected]>: >>> > >>> > Hi all, >>> > Maybe a stupid question, But what is the difference between the >>> > distribution >>> > (windows vs. unix like) except the launchers and the file modes? >>> > >>> > Romain. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> >>> Committer & Project Lead >>> OPS4J Pax for Vaadin >>> <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project >>> Lead >>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >> >> >> >> -- >> Christian Schneider >> http://www.liquid-reality.de >> >> Open Source Architect >> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
