I also think we should do a beta. A good time would be when the aries release is out.
Ideally the beta should have no SNAPSHOT deps in it.

Christian

Am 22.05.2012 16:15, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
I'm curious, do we plan to do beta and/or alpha releases? Maybe after
cutting the stabilisation branch it might be a good idea to cut a
beta? I know we had those discussions some time ago; nevertheless
Karaf-3 is PRETTY, VERY, VERY, VERY big in changes... so a beta might
be a good idea in this special case... don't you think?

Kind regards,
Andreas

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Romain Gilles<[email protected]>  wrote:
That's interesting. I have plan to switch to 3.0 as soon as an alpha will be
available.

Thanks,

Romain

Le mardi 22 mai 2012, Christian Schneider a écrit :

For Karaf 3 we already joined the distros.

Christian

Am 22.05.2012 11:04, schrieb Romain Gilles:

Thank you.
Then I will build a distribution that join the both ;)

Romain.

Le mardi 22 mai 2012, Achim Nierbeck a écrit :
As you just guessed it, the difference is just the launchers and the
file modes :)

regards, Achim

2012/5/22 Romain Gilles<[email protected]>:
Hi all,
Maybe a stupid question, But what is the difference between the
distribution
(windows vs. unix like) except the launchers and the file modes?

Romain.


--

Apache Karaf<http://karaf.apache.org/>  Committer&  PMC
OPS4J Pax Web<http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
Committer&  Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
<http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home>  Commiter&  Project
Lead
blog<http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>


--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de

Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com


--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de

Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to