+1 from me too; nevertheless I think you should add the aries bug-fix
upgrades to your list of important upgrades too; those will make such
things as offline cxf with blueprint work!

Kind regards,
Andreas

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Jamie,
>
> +1
> There is no Pax web 1.0.12 in the queue so I'm fine with this.
>
> regards, Achim
>
> 2012/6/11 Jamie G. <[email protected]>:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> It's been several weeks since our last Apache Karaf 2.2.x patch
>> update. During this time we have collected 12 resolved issues. I'd
>> like to schedule in a Karaf 2.2.8 RC build for mid to late June time
>> frame, which should allow enough time for currently in progress issues
>> to be resolved.
>>
>> Current high lights of this patch include updates to Pax Web 1.0.11,
>> Pax-Logging 1.6.7, and Jansi 1.9. As we have the 2.3.x branch, I do
>> not expect to see new features appear on the 2.2.x line.
>>
>> I do not believe producing this patch will impact development efforts
>> on any of the other branches or sub projects.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jamie
>
>
>
> --
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> Committer & Project Lead
> OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
> <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project
> Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>

Reply via email to