My understanding that the spring31 feature would be an optional part
of Karaf 2.3.

As to Karaf 2.4 - other than spring 3.1 i think we need to start a
separate thread to discuss that particular branch's major changes.
Please note, we've added a 2.4.0 version to Jira so that issues for
that future release can be recorded.

Cheers,
Jamie

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Christian Müller
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I share most/all of the opinions.
>
> My additional 0,02$:
> - If we have to release Karaf 2.3.0 today or in the next days, may be it's
> safer to postpone the spring31 feature for Karaf 2.4.0/3.0.0. In this case,
> Karaf 2.4.0 should be released in the next 2 - 5 weeks.
> - If we can postpone Karaf 2.3.0 for 4 - 14 days, it would be great to
> provide the spring31 feature in Karaf 2.3.0.
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Jamie G. <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The dependencies table Achim was mentioning:
>>
>> http://karaf.apache.org/index/documentation/karaf-dependencies/karaf-deps-2.2.x.html
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Fwiw, mina 2.0.7 is now available, so i'll update 2.3.x branch to it,
>> > unless someone has already done it.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> I think a valid "workaround" would be to offer a spring31 feature, I'm
>> >> quite sure
>> >> we're able to extract that kind of feature from trunk ;)
>> >>
>> >> regarding the road-map proposal, yes this would be really helpful.
>> >> I know we have a Matrix showing which version does contain which
>> >> dependencies (@Jamie where is it located?)
>> >> but somehow it's again a pain to find it.
>> >>
>> >> I think we need to redo our webpage desperately since not all
>> >> information can be found easily and the menu
>> >> doesn't necessarily relate to the content (e.g. the manual)
>> >>
>> >> regards, Achim
>> >>
>> >> 2012/10/9 Charles Moulliard <[email protected]>:
>> >> > Even if I understand the karaf position I completely agree about
>> Claus's
>> >> > remark to also have Spring 3.1 for Camel and others projects.
>> >> >
>> >> > What I would like to propose is that we create for Karaf/ServiceMix
>> >> > projects a page containing a table of the different software used and
>> >> have
>> >> > a roadmap about them. This question is important not only for Spring
>> >> > framework but also Pax, Aries, Felix, ... which are (re)packaged into
>> >> > Karaf/ServiceMix
>> >> > This will avoid that we discover a few days before the publication of
>> a
>> >> > release that we have miss something
>> >> >
>> >> > Just my 5€ cents.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Oct 8, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Agree Claus, but Camel is not the only application running on
>> Karaf.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> So, we have to think about "others projects" as well.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I have no problem to upgrade to Spring 3.1.x but later (why not
>> >> imagine
>> >> >> a Karaf 2.4.x for that, it could be a good indicator), and propose
>> both
>> >> >> Spring 3.0 and 3.1 in Karaf 2.3.0 (depending of the impact, that I
>> gonna
>> >> >> test tonight).
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I agree with that.    I know CXF has had very little testing with
>> >> Spring
>> >> >> 3.1.x.    I would definitely prefer keeping on 3.0.7 for Karaf 2.3
>> and
>> >> >> think about that for 2.4.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I also agree that this is way to close to "release" to flip out a
>> >> major
>> >> >> component like spring.   Maybe a month ago, but not now.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Yeah I can understand the deadline issue as well.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> But its a shame that the new shiny Karaf 2.3.0 comes out of the box
>> >> >> with the old Spring 3.0.7 from Dec 2011. And there has not been any
>> >> >> new releases of Spring 3.0.x since.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It would be cool if it was possible to provide an easy way for people
>> >> >> to switch Karaf to offer Spring 3.1.
>> >> >> Maybe that requires to offer a spring31 feature, and an easy way for
>> >> >> people to configure Karaf to use that.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> At Camel we have a CI job that tests Camel with Spring 3.1. The
>> >> >> upgrade for Camel has been painless.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Dan
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Regards
>> >> >> >> JB
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On 10/08/2012 06:48 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>> >> >> >>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>> >> [email protected]>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>> Camel 2.10.x uses Spring 3.0.7 for now, for we are "aligned"
>> with
>> >> >> Camel
>> >> >> >>>> 2.10.
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> Does it make sense to update to Spring 3.1.x (for future Camel
>> >> version
>> >> >> >>>> maybe) ?
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Well Camel 2.10 supports both Spring 3.0.x and 3.1.x. And we are
>> >> >> >>> frankly only holding back because of Karaf.
>> >> >> >>> As when people deploy Camel in Karaf they inherit the spring from
>> >> >> Karaf.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> People in the community would like to use Spring 3.1.x as its
>> been
>> >> out
>> >> >> >>> since December 2011.
>> >> >> >>> And its the stable release path where they cut new releases.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> Regards
>> >> >> >>>> JB
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> On 10/08/2012 05:55 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Jamie G. <
>> >> [email protected]>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> Hi Claus,
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>  From the Karaf 2.3.0 pom file:
>> >> >> >>>>>> <spring.osgi.version>1.2.1</spring.osgi.version>
>> >> >> >>>>>> <spring2.version>2.5.6.SEC03</spring2.version>
>> >> >> >>>>>> <spring.version>3.0.7.RELEASE</spring.version>
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> Crap I think you guys shoulder consider switching to the 3.1.2
>> >> >> release
>> >> >> >>>>> of Spring.
>> >> >> >>>>> As well Jetty 7.6.7, so people have the latest stable release
>> of
>> >> >> these
>> >> >> >>>>> 2 important pieces.
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> Cheers,
>> >> >> >>>>>> Jamie
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Claus Ibsen <
>> >> [email protected]>
>> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Hi
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> What Spring version does Karaf 2.3.0 come with out of the
>> box?
>> >> >> 3.0.x
>> >> >> >>>>>>> or the newer 3.1.x ?
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Jamie G. <
>> >> >> [email protected]>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> I'm always ready!
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Cheers,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Jamie
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:08 AM, [email protected] <
>> >> [email protected]>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Great, thanks a lot !
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Talend - http://wwx.talend.com
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> ----- Reply message -----
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> From: "Andreas Pieber" <[email protected]>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Subject: Apache Karaf 2.3.0 very close
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, Oct 8, 2012 9:17 am
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hey,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>> >> >> [email protected]>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> @Andreas, could you take a look on KARAF-1878 and
>> KARAF-1752
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> (assigned to
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> you) ? If you are busy today, I think we can postpone to
>> >> 2.3.1.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> I wanted to keep KARAF-1878 opened for review till tonight;
>> >> I'll
>> >> >> apply
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> afterwards. I'll also apply KARAF-1752 then.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Andreas
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks all guys,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Regards
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> JB
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> --
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Claus Ibsen
>> >> >> >>>>>>> -----------------
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> >> >> >>>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Email: [email protected]
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Twitter: davsclaus
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> --
>> >> >> >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> >> >> >>>> [email protected]
>> >> >> >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> >> >> >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> >> >> >> [email protected]
>> >> >> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> >> >> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Daniel Kulp
>> >> >> > [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
>> >> >> > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Claus Ibsen
>> >> >> -----------------
>> >> >> Red Hat, Inc.
>> >> >> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> >> >> Email: [email protected]
>> >> >> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> >> >> Twitter: davsclaus
>> >> >> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
>> >> >> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Charles Moulliard
>> >> > Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat)
>> >> > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> >> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>> >> Committer & Project Lead
>> >> OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
>> >> <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project
>> >> Lead
>> >> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > ------------------------
>> > Guillaume Nodet
>> > ------------------------
>> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> > ------------------------
>> > FuseSource, Integration everywhere
>> > http://fusesource.com
>>
>
>
>
> --

Reply via email to