+1, and actually I think we might just skip 2.3.1 and call it a 2.4 after
this one is applied :D

what do you think

regards, Achim


2013/1/15 Ioannis Canellos <[email protected]>

> +1 on creating a 2.4 branch.
> Personally I am ok at adding new features on micro releases as long as they
> don't change the API, especially considering the speed at which we bring
> out new major and minor ones.
>
> --
> *Ioannis Canellos*
> *
>
> **
> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
> **
> Twitter: iocanel
> *
>



-- 

Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home>
Commiter & Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>

Reply via email to