Just another thing: if we decide to "speed up" the minor number
versioning (more 2.5.0, 2.6.0, etc, which looks like a good idea to me),
I think that it makes sense to create a karaf-2.x.x branch in that case
(and "minor" branches only when it's required).
My $.02
Regards
JB
On 01/15/2013 05:53 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
+1, and actually I think we might just skip 2.3.1 and call it a 2.4 after
this one is applied :D
what do you think
regards, Achim
2013/1/15 Ioannis Canellos <[email protected]>
+1 on creating a 2.4 branch.
Personally I am ok at adding new features on micro releases as long as they
don't change the API, especially considering the speed at which we bring
out new major and minor ones.
--
*Ioannis Canellos*
*
**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
