I actually fail to see what you're looking for Andrei.  We have nightly
builds already.  Aren't those sufficient ?


On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Jamie G. <[email protected]> wrote:

> RC's are a tagged and signed entity that are released from Apache -
> that requires a vote. The nightly snapshot builds are available for
> integration purposes in the mean time.
>
> Cheers,
> Jamie
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Andrei Pozolotin
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Jamie:
> >
> > cant you make a case that RC is not really a release?
> >
> > Andrei
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: Re: release by subsystem
> > From: Jamie G. <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
> > Date: Tue 12 Mar 2013 07:24:53 PM CDT
> >
> > Sorry for jumping in here,
> >
> > Apache builds require approval before release:
> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >
> > As to release schedule, that's purely at the discretion of the
> > community to my best understanding.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jamie
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Andrei Pozolotin
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Guillaume:
> >
> > how about automatic, once a month, karaf RC-XXX release, w/o vote?
> >
> > Andrei.
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: Re: release by subsystem
> > From: Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > Date: Tue 12 Mar 2013 06:24:24 PM CDT
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Andrei Pozolotin <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >     *Jean-Baptiste, Łukasz**
> >     *
> >     FYI:
> >
> >     1) I released a jenkins plugin which allows incremental cascaded
> >     releases from any level of dependency tree:
> >
> > https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Maven+Cascade+Release+Plugin
> >
> > Thx for the heads up.
> >
> >
> >     2) I hope you can switch away from monolithic releases and release
> >     karaf modules/subsystems on demand and often.
> >
> > Releasing karaf is fairly easy, and we rarely are waiting for third party
> > dependencies.
> > When that happens, it's mostly because we have bugs waiting to be fixed.
> >
> >
> >     3) IIRC,  the first time "3.0.0.RC1 will come out in 2 weeks"  was
> >     promised on this mailing list about 2 years back :-)
> >
> > And this has nothing to do with the release process.  Technically
> speaking,
> > trunk or branches are mostly always in a releasable state.
> >
> >
> >     Thank you,
> >
> >     Andrei
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: Re: release by subsystem
> > From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Thu 07 Feb 2013 02:26:10 PM CST
> >
> > Hi Andrei,
> >
> > I understand your point.
> >
> > Some parts are really tight together. However, that's the purpose of
> > the minimal distribution and framework:
> >
> > - framework should provide the most minimal Karaf container (however,
> > it embeds Aries Blueprint for instance, as Karaf bundles use it)
> > - minimal is a very lightweight Karaf container, the purpose is to let
> > the user create a custom distribution on top of that.
> >
> > I'm listening all proposals to improve these distributions !
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On 02/07/2013 05:30 PM, Andrei Pozolotin wrote:
> >
> >      *Jean-Baptiste*
> >
> >      I am curious if you envision to change karaf layout so release by
> >      subsystem is possible.
> >
> >      For example, if I use minimal sub set of karaf, which does not need
> >      Aries, why should I wait for it?
> >
> >      this is similar to how ops4j was partitioned way back, so there are
> >      no monolithic Godzilla releases any more.
> >
> >      Thank you,
> >
> >      Andrei
> >
> >
> >
>



-- 
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Red Hat, Open Source Integration

Email: [email protected]
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to