+1 from me Switching to git will let us process pull requests in easier way. Maven is not afraid of git as well.
I'm not scared by Camel issues with git since they have more modules than they need. ;-) Cheers, Lukasz Wiadomość napisana przez Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]> w dniu 25 cze 2013, o godz. 11:54: > Hi, > > I'm > -1 for this due to the things that popped up with the latest Camel release. > [1] > Even though I do not fully understand why this is an issue, cause when > releasing OPS4j artefacts we never had such issues. > > If this issues is cleared I'd go for +1 > > regards, Achim > > > [1] - > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-10-5-tp5734607p5734684.html > > > 2013/6/25 Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> > >> hey, there is no 0 option :-) >> >> still +1 for the switch. Would make forking and experimenting (and >> especially getting the changes back) so much easier... >> >> Kind regards, >> Andreas >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected] >>> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a >> formal >>> vote to migrate our scm from svn to git. >>> >>> Please vote to approve this switch: >>> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git) >>> [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments) >>> >>> This vote will be open for 72 hours. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Regards >>> JB >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> [email protected] >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >> > > > > -- > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & > Project Lead > OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> > Commiter & Project Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
